SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 8

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Chetak Logistic Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Wakeel Khan for applicant;
Tikaram Kurmi, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Petitioner has filed this criminal revision under section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the order dated 10.3.2022 passed by CJM Seoni, District Seoni, whereby Court has rejected the application for supurdnama filed by him.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the Police Station Kotwali District Seoni has registered crime No. 178/2022 for the offence punishable under sections 4, 6, 9 of MP Govansh Vadh Pratishedh Adhiniyam, 2004 & 4, 6, 6(A), 6(B)(1) of M.P. Krashak Pashu Parirakshan Adhiniyam, 1959 & 11(d) Prev. of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 & 34(2) M.P. Excise Act, 1915 & 66/192 M.V.Act, 1988 in which the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration HR38U-7856 has been seized alleging indulgence of it in illegal transportation of cow progenies.

3. After seizure of vehicle, petitioner has filed an application under section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for interim custody of vehicle. CJM by impugned order dated 10.3.2022 dismissed the application.

4. Petitioner has challenged the impugned order on ground that he has filed documents of ownership of seized vehicle and no other person has claimed vehicle, therefore, as per settled law, vehicle ought to have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top