SUBODH ABHYANKAR, SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Indore Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Dangi S/o Shri Umrao Singh Dangi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBODH ABHYANKAR, J.
1. Heard.
2. This order shall govern the disposal of both the writ appeal Nos.1178 and 1179 of 2019 as the common issue involved in these appeals.
3. For the sake of convenience the facts as narrated in W.A. No. 1178 of 2019 are being taken into consideration.
4. This writ appeal has been preferred under Section 2(1) of Madhya Pradesh Uchha Nyayalaya (Khand Nayaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 and the rules made thereunder against the order dated 20.12.2018, passed in W.P. No. 15646 of 2018 filed by the respondent/petitioner Sunil Dangi wherein the writ petition filed against an advertisement dated 02.07.2018 issued by appellant No. 1/respondent No. 1 Indore Development Authority for sale of 13 residential plots in Scheme No. 94, Sector-E despite informing the petitioner that no residential plots are available with the respondents. The learned Judge of the writ Court has partly allowed the petition and has directed the respondents to handover one plot from the available 13 plots in Sector -E or allot Plot No. T1 or T2 which are also vacant in Sector-F.
5. In brief the facts as have been noted by the learned Judge of the writ Court, which are not disputed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.