SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 134

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Murtaza Malik – Appellant
Versus
LIC Housing Finance Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Anuj Agrawal for appellants; Zameer Ahmad Khan for respondent.

JUDGEMENT

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants/plaintiffs under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgement and decree dated 26.11.2022, passed by the Fourth Additional District Judge, Indore in Civil Suit No.921-A/2019.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the appellants/plaintiffs filed a civil suit for declaration simpliciter against the respondent/LIC Housing Finance Limited seeking the following relief :--

“The Plaintiffs therefore pray for a decree declaring that the structure of the Building constructed on the Plot No.1 & 2, Kibe Compound, Indore is not mortgaged with the Defendant;

Cost of the suit be also awarded to the Plaintiffs.”

3. The facts in brief are that the plaintiffs obtained a loan of Rs.12 Crore from LIC Housing Finance Ltd. and for the same, the disputed land situated at Plot No.1 & 2, Kibe Compound, Indore was kept as a collateral security with the LIC Housing Finance Ltd. The case of the plaintiffs is that as the plaintiffs defaulted in making the payment, a notice was affixed on their premises by the defendant/LIC Housing Finance stating that the LIC has the charge over the property and no transaction in respect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top