SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 130

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
Mannulal Jain – Appellant
Versus
M. P. State Electricity Board – Respondent


Advocates:
V. K. Pandey for appellant;
Anoop Nair for respondents No. 1 & 2.

ORDER

1. Assailing the order dated 9.1.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in allowing the Writ Petition No.3461 of 1999, the respondent No.1 therein is in appeal.

2. It is the case of the appellant that he was an employee in the respondent department working on the post of Driver. A post was created of Crane Operator (Plant Assistant Grade-I) in pursuance to the order dated 27.12.1979 in the pay scale of Rs. 425-15-435-18-557-EB-20-679 and the appellant was appointed against the said sanctioned post vide order dated 6.11.1981 under the temporary Work Charge Establishment on a fixed pay of Rs.550/-. His services were subsequently regularized and he was granted a pay scale of Rs.550-822/-. It is the case of the appellant that he was already working as a Crane Operator since his induction in service as a regular driver on 11.3.1976. The services are governed by Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 (for short “ the MPIR Act”) and also by Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board Regulation for revision of pay scale for Class-III and IV employees. It is his case that pay scale of Crane Operator was Rs.665-20-745-20-883-EB-25-1008 w.e.f 1.4.1980. The same was revised w.e.f 1.4.1984 fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top