SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 130

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ravi Malimath, CJ, and Vishal Mishra, J.
Mannulal Jain v. M. P. State Electricity Board & Others
Writ Appeal No. 304 of 2007 (Jabalpur): against the order
dated 9.1.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 3461 of 1999;
Decided on 5.4.2023

Advocates:
V. K. Pandey for appellant;
Anoop Nair for respondents No. 1 & 2.

Headnote:

Industrial Relations Act, 1960 (M. P.) -- Ss. 31 (3)/64-A and 108 -- M. P. State Electricity Board (Class III and Class IV Employees) Revision of Pay Regulations, 2001 -- Reg. 1 (b) -- pay scale -- revised pay scale in terms of Regulations -- appellant was working on post of driver -- post of crane operator was created and appellant was appointed against said sanctioned post -- his services were subsequently regularized but pay scale was not revised as per Regulations -- held -- two newly sanctioned posts of crane operator receiving revised pay scale -- no explanation as to how there can be two pay scales for same posts, except that two posts have been sanctioned by Board in that particular pay scale -- sanctioning of two additional posts does not mean that pay scale on post of crane operator can be different from what has been provided in Schedule -- appellant entitled to benefit of revised pay scale -- interest @ 6% p.a. from date of entitlement till date of payment. [Paras 8 & 9

vkS|ksfxd laca/k vf/kfu;e] 1960 ¼e-iz-½ &&/kkjk 31¼3½64&d rFkk 108 && e-iz- jkT; fo|qr eaMy ¼r`rh; Js.kh rFkk prqFkZ Js.kh deZpkjh½ osru dk iqujh{k.k fofu;e] 2001 && fofu- 1 ¼[k½ && osrueku && fofu;eksa ds fuca/kukuqlkj iqujhf{kr osrueku && vihykFkhZ pkyd ds in ij dk;Zjr Fkk && Øsu vkWijsVj dk in l`ftr dj vihykFkhZ dks mDr eatwj in ij fu;qDr fd;k x;k && ckn esa mldh lsok fu;fer dh xbZ ijarq mldk osrueku fofu;eksa ds vuqlkj iqujhf{kr ugha fd;k x;k && vfHkfu/kkZfjr && gky gh esa eatwj Øsu vkWijsVj ds nks inksa dks iqujhf{kr osrueku izkIr gks jgk gS && bl ckjs esa dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fd ,d&gh in ds fy, nks osrueku dSls gks ldrs gSa] flok; blds fd eaMy }kjk ml fof'k"V osrueku esa nks in eatwj fd, x, gSa &&nks vfrfjDr inksa dh eatwjh dk vFkZ ;g ugha fd Øsu vkWijsVj ds in dk osrueku mlls fHkUu gks ldrk gS tks vuqlwph esa micaf/kr gS && vihykFkhZ iqujhf{kr osrueku ds Qk;ns dk gdnkj
&& gdnkjh ds fnukad ls lank; ds fnukad rd 6 izfr'kr izfro"kZ dh nj ls C;ktA ¼iSjk 8 ,oa 9

ORDER

1. Assailing the order dated 9.1.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in allowing the Writ Petition No.3461 of 1999, the respondent No.1 therein is in appeal.

2. It is the case of the appellant that he was an employee in the respondent department working on the post of Driver. A post was created of Crane Operator (Plant Assistant Grade-I) in pursuance to the order dated 27.12.1979 in the pay scale of Rs. 425-15-435-18-557-EB-20-679 and the appellant was appointed against the said sanctioned post vide order dated 6.11.1981 under the temporary Work Charge Establishment on a fixed pay of Rs.550/-. His services were subsequently regularized and he was granted a pay scale of Rs.550-822/-. It is the case of the appellant that he was already working as a Crane Operator since his induction in service as a regular driver on 11.3.1976. The services are governed by Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 (for short “ the MPIR Act”) and also by Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board Regulation for revision of pay scale for Class-III and IV employees. It is his case that pay scale of Crane Operator was Rs.665-20-745-20-883-EB-25-1008 w.e.f 1.4.1980. The same was revised w.e.f 1.4.1984 from Rs.960-1480/-. Again revised from Rs.1550-2800/- w.e.f from 1.4.1989 again revised as Rs.3560-7700/- w.e.f 1.4.1994 and the same was again revised w.e.f 1.1.2001 as Rs.5100-10850/-. The appellant submitted various representations to the authorities for grant of revised pay scale in terms of the revision of pay rules applicable to the appellant but of no consequence. He preferred an application under section 31(3) read with section 64-A and 108 of MPIR Act before the Labour Court. The application was rejected by the labour Court vide order dated 19.8.1997 against which he preferred an appeal before the State Industrial Court under section 65 of the MPIR Act. The same was allowed vide order dated 13.5.1999 setting aside the order passed by the Labour Court directing the respondent/Board to give him proper pay scale of Rs. 665-1008/- of Crane Operator from the date of regularization of the appellant i.e 19.10.1982. The State Industrial Court further directed to pay the revised scales made effective from time to time. Against the order passed by the Industrial Court, the Board has preferred the writ petition on the ground that new posts of Crane Operator was sanctioned in the fixed pay scale of Rs.425- 697/- which is reflected from order dated 27.12.1979. The appointment of the appellant was made in pursuance to the order dated 27.12.1979. He was entitled to be granted the pay scale of Rs.425-697/-. The same was already granted to him as it was a new sanctioned post granted to the appellant in a fixed pay scale therefore the benefit of revised pay scale as applicable to Class-III and IV employees is not applicable in the case of the appellant. The writ petition came up for hearing and was decided by the impugned order dated 9.1.2007. The same was allowed on the ground that the appointment of the petitioner was against the newly sanctioned posts in terms of order dated 27.12.1979 in a fixed pay scale. The appellant having accepted the terms and conditions of the order dated 27.12.1979 was granted appointment on the post of Crane Operator in the fixed pay scale. Therefore, the benefit of pay scale of the Crane Operator cannot be extended to him. The aforesaid aspect was considered by the learned Labour Court. Therefore, the writ petition was allowed.

3. The same has been assailed by filing a writ appeal on the sole ground that the services of petitioners are governed by the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board Regulations for revision of pay scale of Class-III and IV employees. The pay scales of Crane Operator are provided along with the revised pay scale from time to time. The appellant was already working on the post of Driver as a Crane Operator and was getting the pay scale and therefore is entitled to revised pay scale of the Crane Operator which is r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top