VIVEK AGARWAL
Vidya Bhushan Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
1. These writ petitions are filed claiming directions to the respondents to correct the date of appointment of the petitioner as 3.3.2011 in impugned list Annexure-P/12 wherein name of the petitioner in W.P. No.26990/2021 is shown at serial No.175 and his initial date of appointment in service is shown as 23.7.2015 and the name of another petitioner-Rajbendra Mishra is mentioned at serial No.182.
2. It is submitted that in fact these petitioners were working under different departments of the State and they competed in the entrance examination which was conducted by M.P. Public Service Commission for recruitment to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forest and for the Forest Rangers. Petitioners cleared upto main examination but were not allowed to participate in the interview process on the ground that they were overage.
3. It is submitted that then one of the petitioners namely Vidya Bhushan Mishra filed W.P. No.1157/2011 which was allowed vide order dated 10.3.2015 whereby Coordinate Bench of this Court held that in terms of the provisions contained in Clause-7 of the advertisement which provided age relaxation upto the maximum age of 38 years even to the employees of local
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.