S. A. DHARMADHIKARI
NIKHAT KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
ORDER : – In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has assailed the order dated 15-10-2014 passed by respondent No. 2 whereby services of the petitioner have been terminated.
2. Brief facts leading to filing of this case are that petitioner was initially appointed in the year 1985 as Copy/section Writer. Since the date of her initial appointment, petitioner is performing her duties with sincerity and utmost devotion. It is submitted that the appointment was made after following due procedure and as per norms of the State Government. Looking to the length of services, State Government had considered similarly situated employees for absorption in the regular cadre. As the case of the petitioner was not considered for absorption at par with similarly situated employees, petitioner had approached this Court by filing W. P. (S) No. 2604/2004, which was allowed with the direction to give appointment on regular basis on the post of LDC vide order dated 15-10-2004. However, the order was never complied with by the respondents. On 6-9-2014, to utter surprise of the petitioner, a news item was flashed in newspaper Patrika in relation to acceptance of illeg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.