VISHAL MISHRA
MANBAHOR PATEL – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent
ORDER/JUDGMENT – Shri Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shr Utkarsh Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1.
With the consent matter is heard finally.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 18-6-2016 passed by the respondent No. 3, by which the services of the petitioner were terminated. Appeal filed against the same has been dismissed vide order dated 26-2-2016 by a non-speaking order and a penalty of stoppage of one annual increment with non-cumulative effect has been imposed upon the petitioner on the ground that he has misbehaved with the Accountant and he has not sent the C.R.A. within time.
3. It is alleged that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Office Assistant Grade-III in Gramin Vidyut Sahakari Samiti, Sidhi and after abolition of the said society, the services of the petitioner were merged with M.P. State Electricity Board vide order dated 13-8-2010 and thereafter with M.P. Purva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company vide order dated 27-11-2012. The petitioner was working at Distribution Centre Amiliya under the control of respondent No. 4. A show cause notice dated 31-7-2015 was issued to the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.