SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1023

ARUN MISHRA, S.ABDUL NAZEER, M.R.SHAH
STATE OF ODISHA – Appellant
Versus
ANUP KUMAR SENAPATI – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?


JUDGMENT :

ARUN MISHRA, J.

1. The question involved in the appeals is whether the employees are entitled to claim grant-in-aid as admissible under the Orissa (Non-Government Colleges, Junior Colleges and Higher Secondary Schools) Grant-in-aid Order, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the order of 1994’), after its repeal in the year 2004 by virtue of provisions contained in Orissa (Non-Government Colleges, Junior Colleges and Higher Secondary Schools) Grant-in-aid Order, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the order of 2004’). The order of 2004 has also been repealed by Orissa (Aided Colleges, Aided Junior Colleges, and Higher Secondary Schools) Grant-in-aid Order, 2008.

2. Before the promulgation of the Order of 1994, the benefit of grant-in-aid to Non-Government educational institutions used to be provided under instructions issued from time to time under the provisions of Orissa Education Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act'). The same has been amended in the year 1994 by insertion of the provisions contained in Section 7-C, extracted hereunder:

7-C. Grant-in-aid – (1) The State Government shall within the limits of its economic capacity, set apart a sum of money an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top