RAVI MALIMATH, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
RAM NARAYAN S/o DURGA PRASAD PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. : – This intra Court appeal takes exception to order dated 28-2-2006, passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 1759 of 2006, whereby the petition preferred by the appellants/petitioners has been dismissed.
2. The case of the appellants is that they are Bhumiswami of agriculture land situated in village Karmeta, P.C. No. 26, Settlement No. 497, Tahsil and District Jabalpur in Khasra No. 95 and 200, comprising a total area 1.117 Hectares. The proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act of 1976”), were initiated for declaring the land as surplus. Draft statement was issued on 30-11-1979. As per the order dated 3-3-1982, land admeasuring 64645.70 square meters was declared as surplus. The proceedings attained finality and the name of the State Government was recorded in revenue records.
3. The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as “The Repeal Act, 1999”) came into force on 18-3-1999 repealing the Act of 1976 with a saving clause in section 3 of the Repeal Act, 1999. The appellants on 18-5-2004 made an application under section 4 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.