SANJAY DWIVEDI
Ram Prasad Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to land ownership and application rejection. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. claim of continued possession of land by petitioners. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. respondents assert compliance with legal requirements. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 4. evidence of possession presented by petitioners. (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's requirement for evidence from respondents. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. judgment allows appeal; alters land records. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 27.05.2009 (Annexure P/2) passed by the respondent no.2 in Revenue Case No. 67/A-90/82-83, whereby the respondent no.2 has rejected an application submitted by the petitioners. In the said application, the petitioners claimed that in place of name of the State illegally recorded in respect of the land situated at Village Purwa, bearing N.B. No. 162, Patwari Halka No. 28/33, Khasra No. 662/15, area measuring 70724 hectares, the entry be corrected and the name of the petitioners be recorded. The respondent no.2 rejected the said application mentioning therein that the land in question has been vested
Maharaj Singh vs. State of UP and Others (1977) 1 SCC 155
Rejender Kumar vs. Kalyan (dead) by Lrs. (2000) 8 SCC 99
Rohini Prasad Patel vs. State of M.P. & others
Rohini Prasad Patel vs. State of M.P. and others
State of Assam vs. Bhaskar Jyoti Sharma
Vinayak Kashinath Shilkar vs. Deputy Collector and Competent Authority & others (2012) 4 SCC 718
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.