SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 349

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Bhagwan Pathak – Respondent


Advocates:
B. D. Singh, Deputy Advocate General for appellants/State;
K.C. Ghildiyal with Aditya Veer Singh for respondent.

ORDER

Malimath, J. -- 1. I.A. No.8256 of 2022 is an application for vacating the interim order dated 5.5.2022. In terms whereof, the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge was stayed. However, on request of learned counsels, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

2. Assailing the order dated 2.3.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in allowing the W. P. No.1890 of 2022, the State and its functionaries are in appeal.

3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was working as an Assistant Sub-Inspector and posted with the 26th Battalion SAF, Guna. A complaint was made by one Smt. Sunita Sharma to the Commandant to the effect that she was a divorcee and the petitioner after marrying her at a temple had established physical relationship with her. The same lasted for almost 8 years. The petitioner was not discharging his obligations towards her. Based on the complaint, a preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Deputy Commandant. The complaint was found to be false. A similar complaint was also made to the Superintendent of Police who conducted an enquiry through the City Superintendent of Police. The report submitted on 5.11.2019, held the petitioner guilty of sendin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top