IRSHAD ALI
Naipal Singh – Appellant
Versus
U. P. Housing And Development Board Thru Secy. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Irshad Ali, J.)
1. Heard Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Puneet Chandra, learned counsel for the respondent(s).
2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned dismissal order dated 29.07.2004 passed by respondent No.2 contained as Annexure-1 to the writ petition with a further prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay all benefits including post-retiral benefits to the petitioner.
3. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are as under:
| Sr. No. | Relevant Facts of the Case |
| a. | The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Engineer vide order dated 08.07.1970. In the year 1982, he was confirmed on the said post. Subsequently, he was promoted on the post of Executive Engineer in U.P. Housing Development Board (for short, "Board"). |
| b. | In the year 1996, the State Government created a new district, namely, Ambedkar Nagar and the Board was giv |
Ex-Naik Sardar Singh v. Union of India and Ors. (1991) 3 SCC 213
Hind Construction & Engg. Co. Ltd. V. Workmen (AIR 1965 SC 917)
Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry v. Workmen (1972) 1 SCC 40
Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank
M.V. Bijlani v. Union of India
Atul Kumar v. U.P. Export Corporation
Union of India and another vs. SC Parashar
Raj Kishore Jha v. State of Bihar and others
S.N. Narula v. Union of India and others
Union of India and others v. S.K. Kapoor
Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Saju P Paul and another
Moni Shankar Vs. Union of India and Anr.
M.V. Bijlani vs. Union of India and ors. (2006) 5 SCC 88
Subhash Chandra Sharma vs. U.P. Co-operative Spinning Mills
S.D. Sharma v. Trade Fair Authority of India
Central Railway vs. Raghubir Saran
Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen
Meengles Tea Estate v. Their Workmen
Kesoram Cotton Mills v. Gangadhar
Central Bank of India Vs. Prakash Chand
Tata Oil Mills. Co. Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen
Bharat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. vs. Jai Singh
Sur Enamel and Stamping Works Ltd. vs. Their Workmen. AIR 1963 SC 1914
Meenglas Tea Estate Vs. Their Workmen. AIR 1963 SC 1719
State of U.P. Vs. C.S. Sharma. AIR 1968 SC 158
Meenglas Tea Estate v. The workmen.
Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India and Ors.
Union of India and Anr. V. G. Ganayutham (dead by Lrs.)
State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. V. J.P. Saraswat
Chandra Kumar Chopra Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Registrar General, Patna High Court v. Pandey Gajendra Prasad & Ors.
B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India and Ors.
V. Ramanna V. A.P. SRTC and ors.
Ranjit Thakur Vs. Union of India 1987 (4) SCC 611
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.