SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Ramkumar Rajput – Appellant
Versus
Anita – Respondent


Advocates:
Saket Malik for petitioner; Sanjay K. Agrawal for respondents No. 2 and 3.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed against order dated 30.1.2020 passed by Commissioner, Narmadapuram Division, Hoshangabad in Case No.017/Appeal/2019-20.

2. It is the case of petitioner that after the death of Gajraj Singh Rajput all the parties inherited equal share in the disputed lands. Since respondents had relinquished their share in the properties, therefore properties were recorded in the name of petitioner. The order of mutation dated 20.2.2011 passed by Tehsildar, Sirali was challenged by petitioner by filing appeal before S.D.O. Khirkiya, District Harda, who by order dated 31.2.2019 set aside the order of mutation and directed for mutation of names of all legal heirs of Gajraj Singh Rajput. The order of S.D.O. was challenged by petitioner before Commissioner Narmadapuram Division, Hoshangabad, who by order dated 30.1.2020 has dismissed the appeal.

3. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that since respondents had relinquished their right in the properties in dispute, therefore, Tehsildar had rightly mutated the name of petitioner. It is submitted that relinquishment deed is not required to be registered.

4. Heard learned cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top