Back
SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Govind – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh Station House Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the petitioner's charge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the charge. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. analysis of legal definitions and precedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conditions for abetment under section 306. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. conclusion and discharge of the petitioner. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
This revision coming on for order this day, the court passed the following:
1. This criminal revision u/S 397 r/W 401 of Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the order dated 23.03.2021, passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Nagda Distt. Ujjain, whereby petitioner's application filed u/S 227 of Cr.P.C. for discharging him from the charges u/S 306 r/W 34 of IPC and also u/S 3/4 of M.P. Protection of Debtors Act, 1937 (the Act of 1937 hereinafter) was rejected.
2. Brief facts giving rise to the present petition are that ASI Suresh Songara received an information about the death of deceased Ratanlal Purohit at P.S. Nagda Distt. Ujjain. He after registering the Merg Intimation Report bearing No. 64/2020, reached the spot and found the dead body of deceased Ratanlal Purohit hanging to noose in his rented room. He called the witnesses issuing safina form a
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for an offence under Section 306 of IPC, there must be active suggestion, instigation, or encouragement on the part of the accused to abet the....
To establish abetment under Section 306 IPC, clear evidence of instigation or culpable conduct by the accused is necessary.
Abetment of suicide under IPC necessitates proof of direct or indirect acts by the accused compelling the victim to commit suicide, which must be supported by credible evidence.
Abetment of suicide under IPC requires clear mens rea and active instigation, which was not proven in this case.
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, it must be proved that the accused's conduct directly instigated the victim to commit suicide, which was not demonstrated in this case.
Demands for repayment do not constitute abetment to commit suicide under relevant IPC provisions.
To establish abetment of suicide under IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or intent to drive the deceased to suicide; mere harassment is insufficient.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
