Back
RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA
Mukesh Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Tulsiram Silawat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for rejection of election petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's electoral challenge outlined. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondent's objections and claims discussed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. counterarguments regarding compliance with election law. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. analysis of high court's jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. affidavit's requirements under election law. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. importance of disclosing sources of information. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. outcome of election petition based on deficiencies. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. dismissal of the election petition. (Para 35) |
JUDGMENT
1. Heard on I.A.No.2048/2022 which is an application under Order 7 Rule 11 and Section 151 of CPC read with Section 86 (1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1951') filed on behalf of respondent no.1 for rejection of election petition on the grounds mentioned therein.
2. The present election petition has been filed by the original petitioner, Dr.Rajesh Sonkar, who also contested the election from the Constituency No.211 Sanwer, District Indore as an independent candidate, but lost to r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
