IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J.
Mukesh Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Tulsiram Silawat & Ors. – Respondents
Election Petition No. 26 of 2019
Decided On : 30-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for rejection of election petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's electoral challenge outlined. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondent's objections and claims discussed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. counterarguments regarding compliance with election law. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. analysis of high court's jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. affidavit's requirements under election law. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. importance of disclosing sources of information. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. outcome of election petition based on deficiencies. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. dismissal of the election petition. (Para 35) |
JUDGMENT
1. Heard on I.A.No.2048/2022 which is an application under Order 7 Rule 11 and Section 151 of CPC read with Section 86 (1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1951') filed on behalf of respondent no.1 for rejection of election petition on the grounds mentioned therein.
2. The present election petition has been filed by the original petitioner, Dr.Rajesh Sonkar, who also contested the election from the Constituency No.211 Sanwer, District Indore as an independent candidate, but lost to respondent no.1 by a margin of 2945 votes in the general elections for Legislative Assembly held in the month of December, 2018. The petitioner has challenged the election petition seeking the following reliefs:-
'(i) call for the entire record from the Election Commission of India in respect of 211, Sanweer Constituency of M.P. State Legislative Assembly.
(ii) declare the election of respondent no.1 from 211 Sanwer Constituency of M.P. State Legislative Assembly as null and void.
(iii) declare the petitioner (who has secured second highest votes) as duly elected member of the M.P. State Legislative Assembly from 211 Sanwer Constituency of M.P.State Legislative Assembly.
(iv) direct for initiation of criminal proceedings under Section 125 A of the Representation of People Act against respondent no.1.
(v) grant any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.
(vi) Grand cost of the petition.'
3. The respondent no.1 filed the reply of the election petition on 16.06.2019 and denied all the allegations in toto and in reply to the allegations made against the respondent no.1, it is contended that the allegations levelled in the election petition do not fall under the definition of corrupt practice described under the Act of 1951. During the pendency of this petition the respondent no.1 resigned from the Legislative Assembly and his resignation was duly accepted on 14.03.2020 and the seat of Sanwer Constituency No.211 was declared vacant on account of resignation of respondent no.1. After the by- elections were notified by the election commission, the original petitioner filed an application for withdrawal of the petition and lastly in compliance to order passed by this Court, the Registry of this Court published the notice on 27.01.2021 seeking withdrawal of the election petition and thereafter on 13.02.2021, the substituted petitioner filed an application under Section 110 (C) of the Act of 1951 which was allowed and the present petitioner has been constituted in place of the original petitioner and this Court permitted him to continue proceedings of the instant election petition.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has submitted that due to the resignation of respondent no.1 and after the by-elections of seat of Sanwer constituency, the relief sought by the petitioner in the original petition has rendered infructuous and the reliefs are only academic. It is also submitted that in the by-elections respondent no.1 won the elections from the Legislative Assembly of Constituency No.211, Sanwer, district Indore by margin of 53,264 votes. Now no cause of action survives and as a result of which petition could be said to be the petition disclosing no cause of action qua the relief of declaring the election of the respon
A.K.K. Nambiar v. Union of India AIR 1970 SC 652
Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board AIR 1967 SC 295
Bhagwati Prasad v. Rajiv Gandhi: 1986 2 SCR 823
Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal Vs. Rajiv Gandhi AIR 1987 SC 1577
Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Ishaqua and Ors. AIR 1955 SC 233
J.M.Biswas vs. N.K.Bhattacharjee & Ors. (2002 (4) SCC 68)
Kavita Trehan (Mrs.) & Anr. vs. Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. (1994 5 SCC 380)
Mairembam Prithviraj @ Prithviraj Singh Vs Pukhrem Sharatchandra Singh reported in (2017) 2 SCC 487
Pasupuleti Venkateswarlu vs. The Motor & General Traders (1975 1 SCC 770
Pawan Diwan Vs. Vidya Charan Shukla reported in 1996 JLJ 762
Resurgence India Vs. Election Commission of India and another reported in (2014) 14 SCC 189
Sheo Sadan Singh Vs. Mohan Lal Gautam reported in (1969) 1 SCC 408
Shipping Corporation of India Limited Vs. Machado Brothers and others (2004) 11 SCC 168
Defective affidavit (not Form 25) in corrupt practice election petition is curable defect; opportunity to rectify required before dismissal under O7 R11 CPC. Pleadings alleging bribery with candidate....
Election petitions must adhere strictly to statutory requirements regarding disclosures, verification, and affidavits; noncompliance may lead to dismissal at the threshold.
Election petitions must comply with statutory requirements, including proper affidavits and clear allegations, or they risk dismissal for lack of cause of action.
Point of Law : In the event of a necessary party not being made a party to the Election Petition, it would be incumbent upon the Court to dismiss the petition.
The absence of an affidavit in Form 25 does not lead to automatic dismissal of an election petition, provided there is substantial compliance with procedural requirements, and any defects noted are c....
An election petition must disclose material facts to establish a cause of action; vague allegations are insufficient for dismissal, and substantial compliance with procedural rules is mandated.
Affidavits in election petitions must meet specific legal standards; non-compliance leads to dismissal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.