SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1249

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J.
Mukesh Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Tulsiram Silawat & Ors. – Respondents
Election Petition No. 26 of 2019
Decided On : 30-09-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Shri Ravindra Chhabra, Senior Counsel With Shri Aman Arora, Learned Counsel For The Petitioner., for the Appellant; Shri Vinay Saraf, Seniordvocate With Shri Yaspal Ahluwalia And Shri Akash Sharma, Advocates For Respondent No.1., for the Respondent

Headnote:(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 83, 86, 99, 125A - Election petition challenging the election of a candidate on grounds of corrupt practices - Dismissed as infructuous due to the resignation of the respondent from Legislative Assembly and subsequent by-elections - Election petition lacked sufficient particulars and failed to meet the mandatory requirements of the Act. (Paras 4, 9, 34)

(B) Election petitions - Requirements and procedure - Allegations of corrupt practices must be supported by affidavits detailing material facts; failure to do so renders the petition non-compliant with statutory provisions. (Paras 8, 16, 32)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner contested the election from Sanwer Constituency but lost by a margin of 2945 votes. After the respondent resigned, a new election was held, and the petitioner attempted to withdraw the petition, which was still found to lack essential details regarding the alleged corrupt practices.

Findings of Court:
The election petition was not maintainable and lacked the requisite particulars to support claims of corrupt practice as required by law.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the election petition disclosed sufficient cause of action and met the legal requirements concerning corrupt practices.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that an election petition must comply with statutory requirements including specific details in affadavits about corrupt practices; failure to do so leads to rejection.

Result: Election petition dismissed as infructuous, with costs not granted.

Table of Content
1. application for rejection of election petition. (Para 1)
2. petitioner's electoral challenge outlined. (Para 2)
3. respondent's objections and claims discussed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. counterarguments regarding compliance with election law. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. analysis of high court's jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
6. affidavit's requirements under election law. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. importance of disclosing sources of information. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. outcome of election petition based on deficiencies. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
9. dismissal of the election petition. (Para 35)

JUDGMENT

1. Heard on I.A.No.2048/2022 which is an application under Order 7 Rule 11 and Section 151 of CPC read with Section 86 (1) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1951') filed on behalf of respondent no.1 for rejection of election petition on the grounds mentioned therein.

2. The present election petition has been filed by the original petitioner, Dr.Rajesh Sonkar, who also contested the election from the Constituency No.211 Sanwer, District Indore as an independent candidate, but lost to respondent no.1 by a margin of 2945 votes in the general elections for Legislative Assembly held in the month of December, 2018. The petitioner has challenged the election petition seeking the following reliefs:-

    '(i) call for the entire record from the Election Commission of India in respect of 211, Sanweer Constituency of M.P. State Legislative Assembly.

    (ii) declare the election of respondent no.1 from 211 Sanwer Constituency of M.P. State Legislative Assembly as null and void.

    (iii) declare the petitioner (who has secured second highest votes) as duly elected member of the M.P. State Legislative Assembly from 211 Sanwer Constituency of M.P.State Legislative Assembly.

    (iv) direct for initiation of criminal proceedings under Section 125 A of the Representation of People Act against respondent no.1.

    (v) grant any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.

    (vi) Grand cost of the petition.'

3. The respondent no.1 filed the reply of the election petition on 16.06.2019 and denied all the allegations in toto and in reply to the allegations made against the respondent no.1, it is contended that the allegations levelled in the election petition do not fall under the definition of corrupt practice described under the Act of 1951. During the pendency of this petition the respondent no.1 resigned from the Legislative Assembly and his resignation was duly accepted on 14.03.2020 and the seat of Sanwer Constituency No.211 was declared vacant on account of resignation of respondent no.1. After the by- elections were notified by the election commission, the original petitioner filed an application for withdrawal of the petition and lastly in compliance to order passed by this Court, the Registry of this Court published the notice on 27.01.2021 seeking withdrawal of the election petition and thereafter on 13.02.2021, the substituted petitioner filed an application under Section 110 (C) of the Act of 1951 which was allowed and the present petitioner has been constituted in place of the original petitioner and this Court permitted him to continue proceedings of the instant election petition.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has submitted that due to the resignation of respondent no.1 and after the by-elections of seat of Sanwer constituency, the relief sought by the petitioner in the original petition has rendered infructuous and the reliefs are only academic. It is also submitted that in the by-elections respondent no.1 won the elections from the Legislative Assembly of Constituency No.211, Sanwer, district Indore by margin of 53,264 votes. Now no cause of action survives and as a result of which petition could be said to be the petition disclosing no cause of action qua the relief of declaring the election of the respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top