IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
M.V. Muralidaran, J.
Houlim Shokhopao Mate @ Benjamin - Appellant
Versus
Lorho S. Pfoze & Ors. - Respondents
Election Petition No. 1 of 2019
Decided On : 23-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of election petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondent's defenses. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. issues framing for trial. (Para 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. allegations of affidavit defects. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. cross-examination and admissions. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. legal framework on nominations. (Para 44 , 54 , 74) |
| 7. undue influence and corrupt practices. (Para 119 , 120) |
| 8. conclusion on election validity. (Para 145 , 146) |
JUDGMENT
1. This Election Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 100 (1)(d)(i)&(iv) and under Section 100 (1)(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (for short, 'the RP Act') to declare that the election of the first respondent from 2-Outer Manipur (ST) Parliamentary Constituency to the 17th Lok Sabha, 2019 as null and void and to declare that the petitioner is the duly elected Member in the 17th Lok Sabha, 2019 from 2-Outer Manipur (ST) Parliamentary Constituency under Section 101 of the RP Act.
2. The Returning Officer of 2-Outer Manipur (ST) Parliamentary Constituency notified the election schedule for a Member to the House of People (Lok Sabha) in No.2-Outer Manipur (ST) Parliamentary Constituency in the following manner:
(a) Last date for making nomination
:
25.03.2019
(b) Date of scrutiny of nomination
:
26.03.2019
(c) Last date for withdrawal of nomination
:
28.03.2019
(d) Date of poll
:
11.04.2019
3. Pursuant to the public notice, the petitioner and others have filed their nomination papers within the time specified and the Returning Officer thereafter published in the Official Gazette the list of the candidates contesting in the Lok Sabha Election, 2019 from No.2-Outer Manipur (ST) Parliamentary Constituency. The list of candidates notified is as under:
1. Houlim Shokhopao Mate @ Benjamin [BJP]
2. Lorho S. Pfoze [Naga People's Front]
3. Angam Karung Kom [Nationalist Congress Party]
4. Hangkhan pautaithul [Janata Dal - United]
5. Ashang Kasar @ Wungnaoshang Kasar @ Wungnao Shang Kasar [North East India Development Party]
6. Leikhan Kaipu [Independent Candidate]
7. ThangminlienKipgen [National People's Party]
8. K.James [Indian National Congress]
4. Succinctly put, the facts are as follows:-
The petitioner has filed his nomination papers along with required documents duly sworn by an affidavit before the Returning Officer. Similarly, respondents 1 to 7 have also filed their nomination papers. He first filed his affidavit in Form 26 dated 21.3.2019 along with his nomination paper as a candidate sponsored by the Naga People's Front (NPF) before the Returning Officer. On 26.3.2019, during scrutiny, the Returning Officer abruptly and improperly accepted the nomination paper of the first respondent. According to the petitioner, there was no proper scrutiny as envisaged under Section 36 (2) of the RP Act. The affidavit in Form 26 filed by the first respondent suffers from the following defects:
1. The first respondent kept Column 5 of Para 4 of the affidavit as blank as nothing is filled up in the relevant column.
2. The gross total value disclosed by the first respondent at Para 7-A(ix) showing Rs.52,23,704/- for self and Rs.2,35,648/- for spouse are not correct and misleading, thereby filing false affidavit.
3. The first respondent failed to disclose vital material information in his affidavit pertaining to his non-agricultural lands and other interest in immovable properties at Para 7-B(ii) and (v) despite having owning immovable properties at Kayinu Village, Mao, Senapati District, Manipur, thereby rendering his nomination as invalid and void.
4. The first respondent failed to disclose the relevant details for showing a sum of Rs.1,12,50,000/- at Para 7-B(vi) of his affidavit, thereby filed a false affidavit.
5. The first respondent also furnished misleading and false particulars/information at Para No.(9B)(f) of his affidavit, thereby failed to disclose the details of contracts entered into by private companies in which candidate or spouse or dependent
A.K.K. Nambiar v. Union of India (1969) 3 SCC 864
Balwan Singh v. Lakshmi Narain AIR 1960 SC 770 : (1960) 3 SCR 91
Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board AIR 1967 SC 295
Bombay v. Purushottam Jog Naik AIR 1952 SC 317
Chandeshwar Saw v. Brij Bhushan Prasad
F.A. Sapa v. Singora (1991) 3 SCC 375
Gajanan Krishnaji Bapat v. Dattaji Raghobaji Meghe (1995) 5 SCC 347
Kisan Shankar Kathore v. Arun Dattatray Sawant
Konappa Rudrappa Nadgouda v. Vishwanath Reddy
Konapppa Rudrappa Nagouda v. Vishwanath Reddy and another
L.R.Shivaramagowda v. T.M.Chandrashekar
M.Narayan Rao v. G.Venkata Reddy and others
Mopuragundu Thippeswamy v. K. Eranna
People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and another v. Union of India and others (2003) 4 SCC 399
Prakash Khadri v. Dr. Vijaya Umar Khandra
Public Interest Foundation and others v. Union of India and another
Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India
Samant N. Balkrishna v. George Fernandez (1969) 3 SCC 238
Thiru John v. Returning Officer
Udhav Singh v. Madhav Rao Scindia (1977) 1 SCC 511
Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms and another (2002) 5 SCC 294
Candidates must fully disclose criminal cases and asset details during elections, as failure constitutes corrupt practice under the Representation of People Act, impacting informed voting.
Point of Law : In the event of a necessary party not being made a party to the Election Petition, it would be incumbent upon the Court to dismiss the petition.
An election petition must disclose material facts and sources of information regarding allegations of corrupt practices, or the petition is deemed insufficient for trial.
The election petition was dismissed due to failure to prove that the alleged non-compliance with election affidavit laws materially affected the election outcome.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.