SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 866

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sujoy Paul, Prakash Chandra Gupta, JJ.
Gaurav Pandey & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 119 of 2016 & Criminal Appeal No. 357 Of 2016
Decided On : 25-07-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Shri Prakash Upadhyay - Advocate, Shri Shreyas Pandit - Advocate, for the Appellant; Shri S.K. Kashyap - Government Advocate, for the Respondent

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 380 - Appeals filed against conviction for murder and theft - Conviction of the appellants based largely on unreliable witness testimony and dubious recovery of evidence - The prosecution failed to establish motive, and the investigation was deemed insufficient and flawed. (Paras 6, 74, 114)

(B) Legal principles regarding eyewitness credibility and admissibility of circumstantial evidence are discussed, emphasizing that the prosecution must prove cases beyond reasonable doubt, and that mere suspicion or conjecture cannot establish guilt. (Paras 90, 112)

Facts of the case:
Appellants allegedly murdered the complainant's father-in-law using an axe and stole valuables. Eyewitness testimony from a key witness was deemed contradictory and untrustworthy. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
The prosecution could not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt and the appellants were given the benefit of doubt, leading to the overturning of the previous conviction. (Paras 114)

Issues: The main issues were the reliability of the eyewitness, sufficiency of evidence, and procedural integrity during the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the necessity for trustworthy evidence in criminal cases, emphasizing that the investigation must be credible, and all aspects of eyewitness testimony must be substantiated with corroborative evidence. (Paras 78, 90)

Result: Appeals allowed; previous judgment set aside.

Table of Content
1. details of the crime and investigation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments raised by the appellants (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
3. further arguments and evidence related to the case (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
4. critique of the investigation process (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
5. underlying principles for judgment rendering (Para 75 , 112)
6. final outcome and decision (Para 114)

JUDGMENT

Sujoy Paul, J. - These appeals filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (In short 'Cr.P.C) take exception to the judgment dated 10/12/2015 passed by III Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Sessions Trial No.258/2011 whereby appellants were held guilty for committing offence under Section 302 of INDIAN PENAL CODE and directed to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.20,000/- with default stipulation. In addition, appellant Trayambak was held guilty for committing offence under Section 380 of INDIAN PENAL CODE for which sentence of two years (R.I.) and Rs.5000/- was imposed as fine. Both the punishments were directed to run concurrently.

Factual Background :-

2. In short, the story of prosecution is that on 17/01/2011 in Police Station Shahpura, complainant Umesh Saxena lodged a report that he received a phone call at about 2:15 A.M. from her sister-in-law Rani @ Shrutikirti that her father-in-law has been murdered. Complainant Umesh Saxena along with his wife Shashikirti rushed to his father-in-law Bishan Narayan Saxena's house B-155 Shahpur, Bhopal at around 3:00 A.M.

3. The complainant found that deceased is lying on a chair/sofa and there is an injury on backside of his head. The blood is coming out from the wound. The blood stained axe is kept in the adjacent room. The almirah in another room is opened and its material is scattered in the entire room. The complainant lodged a report against unknown person alleging that his father-in-law was murdered by said person. Accordingly, Crime No.47/2011 was registered for committing offence under Section 302 of IPC.

4. The forensic team was called by police to examine the scene of crime. Mr. Sunil Gupta, Scientific Officer of Forensic Department examined the said place and found that deceased was sitting on a sofa and there were two injuries on the back of his head. The blood stains were found on the floor, sofa-set, paijama, kurta and maroon sweater of the deceased. No injury was found on remaining part of body except the head. In store room, the blood stained axe was found.

5. The forensic team prepared a spot map. They collected the blood from floor and from the wound of the deceased. The sample of hairs of deceased, a yellow medicine kept near dining table and blood stained axe were recovered. The Panchayatnama of dead body was prepared. A list of ornaments/materials allegedly looted from scene of crime were prepared. The body of deceased was sent for post-mortem.

6. The post-mortem report shows that reason of death is head injuries caused by hard and sharp object. Deceased Bishan Narayan Saxena died because of shock and excessive bleeding.

7. During the course of investigation, the appellant Gaurav Pandey was arrested and on the basis of his memorandum prepared under Section 27 of Indian EVIDENCE ACT (in short ' EVIDENCE ACT '), a polythene packet containing his blood stained shirt was recovered near Railway Station, Bhopal. Similarly, appellant Trayambak was arrested and pursuant to his memorandum prepared under Section 27 of EVIDENCE ACT , his blood stained clothes were recovered from the house of Avnish. From the shirt, an ATM card of Central Bank was recovered. As per the memorandum of Trayambak, a gold ring was recovered from his friend Chati.

8. During the course of investigation, Sanjeev Ranjan Saxena produced a letter (Article-A) before the Court which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top