SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 845

PRANAY VERMA
Shankarlal Thru. Lrs – Appellant
Versus
Chandraprakash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Jain, Advocate, Kushagra Jain, Advocate, Poursh Ranka, Advocate
Final Result : Dismissed

JUDGMENT

Pranay Verma, J. - This appeal under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code has been preferred by appellants against judgment and decree dated 09/11/2021 passed in Civil appeal No.19/2021 by IInd additional District Judge, Mandsaur, District-Mandsaur affirming the judgment and decree dated 19/02/2021 passed in Civil Suit No.2400006/12 by Vth Civil Judge, Class-I, Mandsaur, District-Mandsaur whereby the claim of plaintiff/respondent for their eviction from the suit shop has been decreed on ground enumerated under Section 12 (1) (f) of M.P. accommodation Control act, 1961 (which shall be referred hereinafter as 'the act, 1961').

2. The plaintiff instituted an action against defendant, since deceased now being represented through his legal representatives, the appellants for his eviction from the suit shop submitting that the same is bonafide required by him for commencing hand-loom business for his son Hemant Kumar, that he is not possessed of any other reasonably suitable alternate accommodation of his own in the town, that premises available adjoining the suit shop is extremely small and wholly unsuitable for business and is not owned solely by plaintiff, that he is carrying on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top