Back
K. LAKSHMAN
VINDHYA TELELINKS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAYS – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Mr. Avinash Desai learned senior counsel representing Mr. T.P.S. Harsha learned counsel for the Applicant, Mr. M Ramakrishna, learned counsel representing Mr. Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for Respondent.
2. This Arbitration Application is filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) read with the Scheme for Appointment of Arbitrator, 1996, for appointment of independent Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.
FACTS:-
3. The Applicant herein is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, and inter alia engaged in the business of manufacturing and supply of various types of cables. Respondent has invited tender bearing No.56185427 for supply of PVC insulated armoured, unscreened, underground railways signaling cable, copper conductor, size 30 core x 1.5sq. MM confirming to specification No.IRS: 63/2014 REV 4 in drums of 500 mts, length (for short, ‘the product’). The applicant has participated in the said tender and was declared as successful bidder to purchase orders bearing No.36.18, 5427.1.03360 dated 23.08.2019 for supply of 45.3 KM of product of the cable and purc
The appointment of an arbitrator must comply with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, particularly Section 12(5), which disqualifies certain individuals from serving as arbitrators.
Point of law: As per the legal position settled by the Supreme Court in catena of judgments, the High Court has the jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the said Act to nullify the appointments made b....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the procedure for appointing arbitrators under the amended Act and the modified Clause 64 of the GCC, emphasizing the ineligibility of certain ....
Arbitral Tribunal consisting of officers of State have become ineligible to become Arbitrators and to continue as Arbitrators.
Point of law: Arbitration -in the absence of an express agreement between the petitioner and the respondent subsequent to arising of disputes whereby the parties expressly agreed to waive the applica....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that parties may waive the applicability of Section 12 (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 by their conduct, and the appointment of an ....
2020 Rules which came into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, i.e. 12.02.2020, cannot be given retrospective effect. The intention of Government of India to make the 20....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
