Back
RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Ramkumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.- Petitioners have filed this petition u/S 482 of CrPC for quashment of FIR as well as charge-sheet in connection with Crime No.16 of 2021, registered at Police Station Joura, District Morena for offence u/S. 498A of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and other subsequent criminal proceedings initiated in connection with RCT No.77/2021 pending before the Court of JMFC, Joura, Morena.
2. Facts leading to filing of present petition, in short, are that the respondent No.2 lodged an oral complaint at police station Joura alleging therein that her marriage was solemnized with Awadhesh Sharma on 10th July, 2019 as per the Hindu rites and rituals at Gopalpura. At the time of marriage, her father had given sufficient dowry as per status. After marriage, her husband Awadhesh Sharma (herein petitioner No.3), mother-in-law Meera Sharma (herein petitioner No.2), father-in-law Ramkumar Sharma (herein petitioner No.1), brother-in-law (jeth) Hridesh Sharma (herein petitioner No.4), sister-in-law (jethani) Smt. Aarti Sharma (herein petitioner No.5) started demanding dowry of four wheeler. On that, she told that her father is a very poor person and is no
The main legal point established is that vague and omnibus allegations without specific details or evidence do not disclose an offence, justifying the quashing of proceedings to prevent the abuse of ....
Specific allegations are essential for prosecuting relatives in dowry cases; vague claims do not suffice.
The fatal impact of unexplained delays in lodging FIRs and the potential misuse of criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
