IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J.
Pappu Gole – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.3069 of 2022
Decided On : 19-01-2022
Bail - Abetment to Suicide - The court granted bail to the applicant, who was facing trial for an offence under Sections 306/34 of IPC, 1860, on the grounds that there was no material to indicate that the applicant abetted the deceased to commit suicide and that only omnibus and general allegations had been levelled against the applicant. The court also considered the fact that the deceased had not made any complaint regarding harassment during her twelve-year marriage with the applicant.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed for bail under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, in connection with a case concerning an offence under Sections 306/34 of IPC, 1860. The deceased had committed suicide by hanging herself, and the applicant had been in custody since 31/10/2021.
Finding of the Court:
The court, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, granted bail to the applicant without commenting on the merits of the case. The court directed the applicant to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and complying with the provisions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. The court also directed the concerned jail authorities to follow COVID-19 guidelines before releasing the applicant.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail during trial, considering the allegations of abetment to suicide and the specific allegations made by the deceased's brother against the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the lack of material indicating abetment to suicide by the applicant, the absence of specific complaints regarding harassment during the twelve-year marriage, and the fact that co-accused had already been enlarged on bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail, with specific conditions and precautions related to the COVID-19 outbreak.
JUDGMENT
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J. - This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, filed by the applicant for grant of bail during trial.
The applicant is facing trial in connection with Crime No.351/2021, registered at Police Station-Palsood, District-Barwani, concerning offence under Sections 306/34 of IPC, 1860. The applicant is in jail since 31/10/2021. a s per prosecution story on 24/10/2021 deceased Kiran committed suicide by hanging herself.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the matter. The applicant and the deceased were married for twelve years and in that period no complaint was made by the deceased to anyone stating that she is being harassed by the accused persons. It is further submitted that there is no iota of material to indicate that at any point of time the applicant abetted the deceased to commit suicide. No offence under Section 306 of IPC is made out since necessary ingredients of Section 107 of IPC are not fulfilled. Only omnibus and general allegations have been levelled against the applicant. Co-accused Madan and Leelubai have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 22/12/2021 passed in M.Cr.C. Nos.61883/2021 and 61884/2021. The applicant is in custody since 31/10/2021, investigation is over, charge sheet has been filed and conclusion of trial will take sufficient long time. Under these circumstances, learned counsel prays for grant of bail to the applicant.
Learned Panel lawyer has opposed the application by submitting that the applicant is husband of the deceased and brother of the deceased has made specific allegations against the present applicant hence he prayed for its rejection.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and on a perusal of the material available on record including the case diary so also to the fact that the applicant and deceased were married for twelve years and no complaint was made by the deceased to anyone regarding the harassment met out by her in her matrimonial house this Court is inclined to grant bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case, this application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant/accused be released on bail on his/her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for securing his/her presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. It is also directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.
In view of the outbreak of 'Corona Virus disease (COVID-19)' the concerned jail authorities are directed to follow the directions/guidelines issued by the Government with regard to 'COVID-19' before releasing the applicant.
This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in case of bail jump and breach of any of the precondition of bail, it shall become ineffective and cancelled without reference to this Bench.
Certified Copy as per rules.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail may be granted during trial when there is a lack of material indicating the commission of the alleged offence and when specific allegatio....
The absence of abetment alleged against the applicant and the prolonged trial period were key factors influencing the court's decision to grant temporary bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of lack of evidence, change in circumstances with key witnesses turning hostile, and the accused's deteriorating health condition....
The court ruled that without substantial evidence proving unnatural death or suicide, the applicant is entitled to bail, emphasizing the necessity of clear proof for conviction under IPC sections.
The court considered the nature and gravity of the allegation, the period of custody, the progress of the investigation, and the applicant's personal circumstances in deciding to grant bail.
Point of Law : Criminal Law - Offence of Cruelty and Dowry Death - Bail Application - No previous complaint against accused and co-accused are on bail, and the fact that applicant is in custody for a....
The court may grant bail based on the statements of witnesses and the likelihood of the trial taking time for its conclusion, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on the suspicious nature of the prosecution story and the claim of innocence by the applicant's counsel.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.