ROHIT ARYA, DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Bhupendra S/o Shankarlal Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arya, J. - Looking to the similitude of controversy involved, both these criminal appeals having arisen from same Sessions Trial are being disposed of by this common judgment.
1. These appeals, under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C., arise out of the judgment dated 18.12.2000 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior in Sessions Trial No.116/1999, whereby appellant Bhupendra stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC, while appellant Kalla alias Kallu Koli stands convicted under section 302 read with S.34 of the IPC.
Both the appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.500/-, in default to suffer R.I. for six months. Co-convict Chandra Prakash alias Kallan S/o Rambabu Jha is reported to have expired on 28/1/2007 and consequently Cr.A. No.83/2001 preferred by him, stood dismissed as abated vide order dated 12/5/2008.
2. Prosecution story, as found proved, is that Badshah (since deceased) was in the business of Dairy and used to return home between 8-9 PM daily. On the fateful day of 30/11/1998, when he did not return, complainant Beer Singh and Rajendra Tomar went in his search. At about 10.30 PM, near Mohan Misthan
Anil Phukan vs. State of Assam (1993)3 SCC 282)
Arokia Thomas vs. State of T.N. (2006)10 SCC 542
Duleshwar and another vs. State of M.P. (2020)11 SCC 440)
Gulam Sarbar vs. State of Bihar (2014)3 SCC 401)
Kallu vs. State of M.P. (2006)10 SCC 313
Khujji @ Surendra Tiwari vs. State of MP
Leela Ram vs. State of Haryana (1999)9 SCC 525)
M.Narsinga Rao vs. State of A.P. (2001)1 SCC 691
State of A.P. vs. Patnam Anandam (2005)9 SCC 237)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.