SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
G. S. Ahluwalia, J.
Subham @ Shivam – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.63554 of 2021
Decided On : 03-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Vivek Kumar Jain, Advocate, Aps Tomar, Advocate
Final Result : Dismissed

Delay in trial does not necessarily warrant grant of bail. Trial Court should record examination-in-chief of witnesses if the defence is not ready to cross-examine them.

Headnote:

Bail - Delay in Trial - The court dismissed the bail application, noting that although the viscera report suggested the cause of death was consumption of poison, the witnesses were not turning up. The court observed that no case was made out for grant of bail on the ground of delay in trial and directed the Trial Court to record the examination-in-chief of witnesses if the defence is not ready to cross-examine them.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested in connection with an offence under Sections 304B, 498A of IPC. The applicant filed a bail application citing delay in trial due to witnesses not turning up.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that no case was made out for grant of bail on the ground of delay in trial and directed the Trial Court to record the examination-in-chief of witnesses if the defence is not ready to cross-examine them.

Issues: Delay in trial due to witnesses not turning up.

Ratio Decidendi: No case made out for grant of bail on the ground of delay in trial. Trial Court directed to record examination-in-chief of witnesses if the defence is not ready to cross-examine them.

Final Decision: The bail application was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

G.S. Ahluwalia, J. - This third application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for grant of bail. The second application was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 22.10.2021 passed in M.Cr.C.No.48169/2021.

2. The applicant has been arrested on 21.3.2021 in connection with Crime No.83/2021 registered at Police Station Tyonda, District Vidisha for offence under Sections 304B, 498A of IPC.

3. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that although the viscera report suggest that the cause of death of the deceased was consumption of poison but the witnesses are not turning up. To substantiate his submissions, the applicant has filed some of the order sheets of the Trial Court to show that the witnesses are not turning up.

4. From the order sheets it is clear that the prosecution witnesses Daulat Singh and Dolly Bai were present on 25.10.2021 but the counsel for the applicant himself got time to cross-examine them and, accordingly, at the request of the counsel for the applicant their examination was deferred. Under these circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that no case is made out for grant of bail on the ground of delay in trial. However, it is directed that whenever any witness is present before the Trial Court and for any reason if the defence is not ready to cross-examine the witness, then the Trial Court, at least shall record his examination-in-chief.

5. With aforesaid observations the application is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top