DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Amar Singh Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
1. The present petition under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the FIR crime No.164/2021 registered at Police Station Seondha, Distt. Datia for the offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(N), 506 and 34 of IPC and its subsequent criminal proceedings in the form of chargesheet.
2. In brief the case of the prosecution is that on 28.07.2021 prosecutrix lodged the report alleging that in the year 2017, she was in contact to the present petitioner and in the year 2020, the present petitioner made a marriage proposal consequently thereto she came to the Seondha on 29.06.2020 and stayed in Seondha in a house where the petitioner made physical relationship with her and by making false pretext of marriage. When the prosecutrix told the petitioner to solemnized marriage, the petitioner use to ignore the prosecutrix. Thereafter prosecutrix came back to her house, where proseuctrix regularly speak from the phone to the petitioner. It is further submitted that on 10.07.2021, the prosecutrix again came back to Seondha and thereafter, the petitioner took the prosecutrix in a car and assaulted her, consequently, thereto the FIR has been lodged on 28.07.2021 ag
Deepak Gulati vs. State of Haryana AIR 2013 SC 2071
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. (2019) 3 SCC (Cri.) 903
Senjeet Singh Vs. State of M.P. and another 2020 (1) MPLJ (Cri.) 260
Sonu @ Subhash Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. AIR 2021 SC 1405
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.