A. BADHARUDEEN
Aneesh V. N, S/o. Rajagopal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash Annexure 1 FIR in Crime No.976/2022 registered by Mattannur Police Station and all proceedings based on it.
2. In this matter, prosecution alleges the commission of offence by the accused punishable under Section 376 of IPC.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the de facto complainant is a married lady who after giving consent to sexual intercourse with the accused, alleged that she was subjected to sexual intercourse on the promise of marriage. Therefore, the allegation itself is not prima facie made out. That apart now the de facto complainant who is arrayed as 2nd respondent, filed affidavit stating that the relationship is consensual and she has no grievance in this matter, supporting quashment.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor formally opposed quashment of the proceedings and at the same time, he conceded that as per the FIS the de facto complainant is a married lady.
5. I have gone through the FIS. The same would suggest that the de facto complainant is a lady who got married ten years back, had a child aged 9 years, m
Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh
Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar (Dr.) v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Jayanti Rani Panda v. State of West Bengal and Another 1984 CrLJ 1535
Prashant Bharti v. State(NCT of Delhi)
Rajiv Thapar & Ors. v. Madan Lal Kapoor reported in 2013 (3) SCC 330
Sonu @ Subhash Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh & anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.