SUJOY PAUL
Yogendra Singh Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This application filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code assails the F.I.R. dated 19-5-2020 in Crime No. 298/2020.
2. In short, the case of applicant is that on 19-5-2020 complainant lodged the F.I.R alleging that applicant developed physical relation with her from 9-11-2018. As per the complaint, the complainant was in contact with applicant for more than two years. They had friendship which converted into a love affair. The applicant gave a promise to marry the complainant and on that pretext, developed physical relation with her at Narmada Mall, Hoshangabad.
3. Grievance of complainant is that when she made a request to actually solemnize marriage, the applicant declined to do so.
4. Shri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant placed reliance on the statement of complainant recorded under section 161 and 164 of Criminal Procedure Code. In addition, statement of her father recorded under section 161, Criminal Procedure Code was also relied upon. On the basis of these statements, it is submitted that it is a case of mutual consent of two adult persons. The offence as alleged against the applicant is not made out. If story of prosecution is read
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.