SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 170

SANJAY DWIVEDI
S. D. Richharia – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Manoj Sharma with Quazi Fakhruddin for petitioner;
Girish Kekre and Punit Shroti, Government Advocates
for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This petition is of the year 2020. Since pleadings are complete and learned counsel for the parties are ready to argue the matter finally, therefore, it is heard finally.

2. The issue involved in the present case is that the petitioner although retired from service on 31.12.2020, received a show cause on 18.12.2020, submitted reply to the said show cause and got charge-sheet served upon him on 23.12.2020. He has filed this petition mainly on two grounds, firstly that the charge-sheet was issued to him by an incompetent authority and secondly that on the same set of facts and charges, earlier he was served with a charge-sheet but being satisfied with the reply submitted by the petitioner, the proceedings were dropped by the Department in the year 2016 and order in this regard got issued on 13.1.2016 (Annexure P/4) but again disciplinary proceeding was initiated which is illegal and is a clear example of double jeopardy.

3. To resolve the controversy involved in the case and the question emerges to be adjudicated, it is necessary to reproduce the facts of the case in nutshell which are as under :--

(3.1) The present petitioner was substantively holding the post of Dy. Commissi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top