SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 1000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA, J.
Sumokshi Tiwari, D/o. S.P. Tiwari & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of M.P. & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No. 19099 of 2023
Decided On : 18-08-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Dinesh Singh Chouhan.
For the Respondent:K.S. Baghel, Government Advocate.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ Petition - Mandamus sought for directing appointment as Audiometrist - Petitioners declared ineligible due to non-registration with Madhya Pradesh Paramedical Council despite BASLP qualifications - Condition of registration challenged on grounds of lack of available courses in the state - Petitioners estopped from challenging recruitment conditions after participating in process. (Paras 2-11)

(B) Principles of Estoppel - Candidates participating in recruitment cannot challenge its validity post unsuccessful result as they are bound by conduct - Supreme Court precedents establish that unsuccessful candidates cannot contest interview processes after participation without prior objections. (Paras 8-11)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought appointment based on qualifications and merit lists but were disqualified for not meeting registration requirements with the Madhya Pradesh Paramedical Council, which they argued was unreasonable due to absence of course offerings in the state.

Findings of Court:
Conditions of the application process upheld; petitioners not registered as required, thus not eligible for appointment.

Issues: Whether the requirement for registration was valid given no courses were run in Madhya Pradesh; candidates’ ability to contest results post-participation.

Ratio Decidendi: Candidates who participate in a recruitment process and fail cannot later contest the conditions of that process; applicants are bound by their actions in the recruitment process.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek appointment based on qualifications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. state argues petitioners cannot challenge conditions. (Para 3 , 5 , 6)
3. court observes petitioners are estopped from challenging conditions. (Para 4 , 11)
4. legal precedence on estoppel and interview fairness established. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
5. court dismisses the petition. (Para 12 , 13)

ORDER :

G.S. Ahluwalia, J.

This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs :

    “I. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to consider the registration certificate of the petitioners which are registered under Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi for the post of Audiometist (Post Code-23), in the interest of justice.

    II. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus to directing the respondents to give the appointment to the petitioners on the post of Audiometist (Post Code-23) because their name is appeared in the top-10 applicant list at Sr. No. 2 and 3, in the interest of justice.

    III. Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deem fit.”

2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioners that an advertisement was issued for Group 5 (Paramedical and Nursing Group) Combined Recruitment Test-2022 by conducting the examination through Employees Selection Board, Bhopal. Petitioners submitted their application forms for the post of Audiometrist (Post Code - 23) by online. Admit cards were issued in favour of petitioners. Petitioners appeared in the examination and they were declared qualified. Name of petitioner No. 1 appeared at Sr.No. 2 of the merit list, whereas name of petitioner No. 2 appeared at Sr.No. 3 of the merit list. By letter dated 9-1-2023 issued by respondent No. 2, candidates were directed for verification of documents. Respondent No. 2 issued another letter dated 5-7-2023 pointing out the names of selected candidates, who were required to appear from 10-7-2023 to 12-7-2023 in the Government Autonomous Yunani Mahavidyalaya Menit Parishar, Bhopal for verification of documents. However, names of petitioners did not appear in the said list. Accordingly, petitioners approached respondent No. 2 and thereafter, list containing the names of disqualified candidates was issued in which name of petitioner No. 1 is mentioned at Sr.No. 7 and name of petitioner No. 2 is mentioned at Sr.No. 8, according to which petitioners were declared disqualified on the ground that they do not hold minimum qualifications as required under the Rules as they are not having registration with Madhya Pradesh Paramedical Council. It is further submitted by counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have passed BASLP (Bachelor in Audiology and Speech Language Pathology) from New Delhi and accordingly, they sought information under R.T.I. from the office of Registrar, Madhya Pradesh Paramedical Council, who by letter dated 18-5-2023 informed that BASLP course is not included in the courses run by M.P. Paramedical Council. It is submitted that petitioners had got themselves registered with Rehabilitation Council of India, New Delhi because in Madhya Pradesh there is no institution running the course of BASLP. Under these circumstances, it is submitted that condition imposed by respondent in the advertisement to the effect that candidates must have registration with M.P. Paramedical Council is bad. If the course of BASLP is not available in the State of Madhya Pradesh, then petitioners cannot be disqualified only on the ground that they are not registered with M.P. Paramedical Council.

3. Per contra, petition is vehemently opposed by counsel for State. It is submitted that so far as conditions mentioned in the advertisement is concerned, petitioners after having participated in the recruitment process, cannot assail the same as now they are bound by principle of estoppel. It is further submitted that it is not the case of petitioners that for the post of Audiometrist except the course BASLP,

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top