IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
G.S. AHLUWALIA, J.
SUNIL DATT CHATURVEDI – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF M.P. – Respondent
W.P. No. 19020 of 2023
Decided On : 14-08-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer based on an administrative decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. claims of malice in transfer decisions. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. duty of court in assessing transfer and allegations. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. legal malice defined and explained. (Para 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 5. judgment on merits of the petition. (Para 30 , 31) |
ORDER :
1. This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed against order dated 28-7-2023 passed by respondent No. 1 by which the petitioner has been repatriated from the post of Registrar, Maharaja Chhatrasal Bundelkhand University, Chhatarpur and has been transferred to Government College, Niwas, District Mandla.
2. It is the case of petitioner that he is an employee of Department of Higher Education, Government of Madhya Pradesh. Initially he was appointed as Assistant Professor (Physics) in the department of Higher Education Government of Madhya Pradesh. By order dated 1-1-2006, he was promoted to the post of Professor (Physics). Since, then the petitioner is working on the post of Professor (Physics). He has put in more than 36 years of blotless service to the respondent/ State. The petitioner was posted as Professor (Physics) in Government Maharaja Autonomous Post Graduate College, Chhatarpur. The said college was transferred to Maharaja Chhatrasal Bundelkhand University, Chhatarpur vide order dated 24-9-2021. On account of transfer of the said college to the University, the petitioner was treated to be posted on deputation in Government Maharaja Chhatrasal Bundelkhand University Chhatarpur and in pursuance of order dated 27-9-2021, the services of the petitioner were taken on deputation by Maharaja Chhatarsal Bundelkhand University, Chhatarpur. By order dated 14-3-2023, petitioner was given charge of the post of Registrar of the University which was taken over by him by order dated 15-3-2023. It is the case of petitioner that immediately after taking over the charge of the post of Registrar, he started taking stern action against private colleges which were not complying with the requisite norms for grant of affiliation. It was found that large number of private colleges were running without any building or infrastructure. The action taken by petitioner against private colleges was prominently reported in the local newspapers. On 20-4-2023, an advertisement was issued by the University inviting applications from eligible candidates for appointment to various Class-IV posts. Total 16 posts of Peon/Chowkidar were notified by the said advertisement. The responsibility for conducting selection for appointment on the notified Class-IV posts was handed over to examination controller by order dated 26-5-2023.
3. It is the case of petitioner that he was not associated with the process of selection for appointment to the notified Class-IV posts. However, it appears that some serious irregularities were committed in the process of selection and accordingly, pamphlet was circulated in the University specifying the names of the persons who were likely to be selected for appointment on the said post. On the basis of said pamphlet, a complaint was made to Hon’ble Chancellor alleging commission of serious irregularities in the process of selection and appointment on Class-IV posts. On the basis of said complaint, an explanation was called from petitioner which was submitted by him on 22-6-2023. It was clearly pointed out by petitioner that he was not associated in the selection process and in fact the responsibilities for conducting the selection was handed over to the examination controller. Looking to the serious complaints regarding the process of selection and appointment on Class-IV posts, the Executive Council of the University took a decision to cancel the entire selection and on the basis of decision taken by Executive Council, an order dated 13-7-2023 was issued whereby cancelling the advertisement dated 20-4-2023.
4. It is the case of the petitioner that the persons who were se
ADM, Jabalpur vs. Shivakant Shukla
All India State Bank Officers’ Federation and others vs. Union of India and others
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. vs. Ajay Kumar
J.N. Banavalikar vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Kalabharati Advertising vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania
Railway Officers Association vs. Union of India
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir vs. District Collector, Raigad and Others
S. Partap Singh vs. State of Punjab
Burden of proving mala fides in transfer orders is high; transfers made in public interest are generally not subject to judicial intervention unless proven arbitrary.
Employment and Service matter - Lecturer in DIET post - Transfers of Petitioner - It is trite that transfer is an incidence of service and as long as the authority acts keeping in view administrative....
Court upheld transfer of university faculty under administrative grounds, affirming limited scope for judicial review in administrative transfer matters.
Transfer of employees is an essential condition of service governed by administrative exigencies, and courts should exercise restraint in interfering with such orders unless they are proven to be ill....
Legal malice is insufficient to challenge a transfer order unless clear procedural violations or malafide intentions can be proven.
A transfer order executed without adhering to due process is deemed punitive and illegal, impacting the employee’s rights and entitlements.
Courts cannot interfere with transfer orders unless shown to be an outcome of malafide exercise or in violation of statutory provisions prohibiting such transfer.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.