JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, B.S.CHAUHAN
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Raigad – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can analyze it and generate the key points with the appropriate references.
JUDGMENT
Dr. B. S. Chauhan, J.
1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 18.6.2009 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 4665 of 2009 by which the High Court has affirmed and upheld the judgment of the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Maharashtra declaring that the conduct of the appellant was unbecoming of the President of Uran Municipal Council and declared him to be disqualified for remaining tenure of municipal councilorship under Section 55B of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 (hereinafter called as the ‘Act 1965) and further declared him disqualified for a period of six years from the date of the order i.e. 21.3.2009.
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are:
A. That the appellant was elected as member of Uran Municipal Council and, subsequently, elected as a President of the Municipal Council. The appellant was served with a show cause notice dated 3.12.2008 by the State of Maharashtra calling upon him to explain why action under Section 55B of the Act 1965 be not taken against him. The chargesheet contained the following six charges:
Charge No.1
Uran Cha
State of Punjab v. Ram Singh Ex. Constable
Disciplinary Authority-cum-Regional Manager v. Nikunja Bihari Patnaik
Government of Tamil Nadu v. K.N. Ramamurthy
Inspector Prem Chand v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
State Bank of India v. S.N. Goyal
Government of A.P. v. P. Posetty
M.M. Malhotra v. Union of India
Baldev Singh Gandhi v. State of Punjab
General Manager, Appellate Authority, Bank of India v. Mohd. Nizamuddin
His Holiness Keshwananda Bharti Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms
Special Reference No. 1 of 2002 (Gujarat Assembly Election Matter)
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes officers Welfare Council v. State of U.P.
R.C. Poudyal v. Union of India
State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh
Mohinder Kumar v. State, Panaji, Goa
Ali Mustafa Abdul Rehman Moosa v. State of Kerala
G. Sadanandan v. State of Kerala
Indian National Congress (I) v. Institute of Social
Bachhitar Singh v. State of Punjab
Tarlochan Dev Sharma v. State of Punjab
Mohan Lal Tripathi v. District Magistrate, Rai Barelly
Ram Beti v. District Panchayat Rajadhikari
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P.
L.I.C. of India v. Consumer Education and Research Centre
Mahesh Chandra v. Regional Manager, U.P. Financial
State of West Bengal v. Atul Krishna Shaw
S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India
Krishna Swami v. Union of India
Sant Lal Gupta v. Modern Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd.
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. L.K. Ratna
Addl. Distt. Magistrate, Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla
Union of India thr. Govt. of Pondicherry v. V. Ramakrishnan
Kalabharati Advertising v. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania
Adi Pherozshah Gandhi v. H.M. Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtra
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai v. Roshan Kumar, Haji Bashir Ahmed
Maharaj Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.