IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA, J.
Sampat Bai – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. – Respondents
Cri. Appeal No. 333 of 2003
Decided on : 14-12-2023
JUDGMENT :
By this appeal filed under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the appellant-Sampat Bai W/o Maujilal Ahirwar has challenged the impugned judgment of conviction dated 11-2-2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in Session Trial No. 33/2001 convicting her for offence under section 498-A of IPC and sentencing her simple imprisonment for one year and pay fine of Rs. 500/- under section 498-A of IPC, in case of non-payment of fine, she should undergo additional S.I. for two months.
2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows :
The deceased-Sunita got married with Raju Ahirwar, who is son of the appellant herein, on 20-5-1997. The mother of the appellant used to live in her village but some times she also used to visit and stay with them. They lived in a rented house at Laundi. On 25-11-2000, the deceased Sunita poured kerosene and set fire by herself and sustained burn injuries, at that time, her husband Raju Ahirwar was outside the house, on hearing her voice he came inside the house and tried to save her and thereafter she was shifted to the hospital by her husband where Dr. S. S. Chaurasiya examined her and found that she got 100% burn injuries on account of which the Doctor referred to the District- Hospital Chhatarpur. In the meant time, information given to the Additional Tehsildar Laundi as she was able to give statement accordingly, Mr. M. K. Jain, Additional Tehsildar (PW-2) recorded the dying declaration of Sunita in which she stated her mother-in-law and sister-in-law used to blame her and said that she allowed some people to her house for watching T.V. Further stated that they also harassed her and she was upset and set fire by herself. After recording the statement, the Dr. Chaurasiya certified the same. The father of the deceased and other relatives came there and met the deceased Sunita enquired about the reason for burning that she stated that her mother-in-law Sampat Bai and Sister-in-law Rani used to harass and beat her, therefore, she set fire by herself. Later, she was shifted to Jhansi Medical College for further treatment on the way she was died on 1-12-2000 and her husband informed the same to the police about the death of his wife. Mr. A. K. Dubey (PW-9) who was in-charge of police station investigated this case, during the investigation he recorded statement of witnesses and forwarded the dead body of the deceased to the Primary Health Centre, Laundi for autopsy, accordingly, Mr. J.P. Nayak who conduced autopsy over the body of the deceased and recorded the reason of death was due to septicemia and 100% burnt and later Mr. A. K. Dubey, who is in-charge of the Police Station, registered a case in Crime No. 4/2001 dated 8-1-2001 under sections 306 and 498-A read with section 34 of IPC against the mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased and inspected the scene and prepared a spot map under the supervision of Mr. Raju Ahirwar. On 11-1-2001, later appellant/accused was arrested and prepared Panchnama and examined the witnesses and it is found that the appellant misbehaved with the deceased, on account of which, the deceased-Sunita committed suicide and after completion of the investigation filed charge-sheet against the appellant/accused thereafter the learned Judicial Magistrate First, Laundi took the cognizance of offence under section 306 and 498-A of IPC and committed the case to the Court of Sessions for trial on 25-1-2001. A prima-facie case having been established charges under section 306 and 498-A of IPC were framed against the appellant/accused (Sampat Bai) and she pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
3. During the trial, the prosecution examined as many as nine witnesses and exhibited some documents in support of their case.
4. Among the nine prosecution witnesses, the learned trial Court relied on the evidence of PW-1 i.e. Doctor S. S. Chaurasiya and PW-2 Chhidami mother of the deceased and PW-3 Santosh brother of the deceased, PW-4 Shri M. K.
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
The court held that mere admonishment and lack of credible evidence regarding dowry demand do not satisfy the statutory definition of cruelty under Section 498-A of IPC.
To establish cruelty under Section 498A IPC, consistent and specific instances of harassment must be proven; vague allegations are insufficient for conviction.
Weight and utility of a dying declaration depend upon surrounding circumstances and credibility which court attaches to it, having regard to evidence led before it.
Conviction under Section 498-A requires clear evidence of cruelty related to dowry demands; a dying declaration indicating accidental death denies such evidence.
For conviction under IPC Sections 306 and 498A, evidence must establish a direct link between cruelty and instigation to commit suicide. Conviction under S.306 may not stand if proof of instigation i....
The discretionary nature of the presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act in cases of abetment of suicide based on cruelty, and the court's authority to consider all circumstances of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the prosecution must prove the intention of the accused to commit cruelty or abet suicide, and the evidence presented must be specific and cre....
The guilt under Section 498A IPC was established through consistent witness testimony despite minor contradictions, affirming the necessity for reliability in evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of 'cruelty' under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, emphasizing the reliance on consistent evidence and dying declaration....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.