IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjeev Sachdeva and Vinay Saraf, JJ.
Abhishek Shukla (Dr.) & Others v. State of Madhya
Pradesh & Others
Writ Petition No. 37078 of 2024 (Jabalpur);
Decided on 9.12.2024
Chikitsa Shiksha Pravesh Niyam, 2018 (M. P.) -- Rr. 14, 7 and 4 -- NEET Post Graduate examination -- in-service candidates -- preparation of merit list -- methodology of percentile as contended by Examination Board does not reflect substantive merit but comparative merit of candidate -- it completely defies logic as to how a candidate who has scored higher in comparison to another candidate in All India rank list has scored lower in State List in comparison to same candidate -- held -- comparison of scores has to be in relation to examination, not list -- if ranking in All India merit list is based on relative performance, then relative performance of two candidates cannot change when they are separated and placed in State List -- there is no challenge to All India result -- even otherwise, such challenge could not be raised as methodology was clearly notified to all candidates prior to examination -- dispute pertains only to State Merit List for State of Madhya Pradesh -- there was no notification of method adopted for preparation of State Merit List -- State Merit List for NEET-PG 2024 examination for State of Madhya Pradesh cannot be sustained -- accordingly quashed -- Examination Board directed to prepare State Merit List afresh by awarding incentivised marks to in-service candidates, not on their raw scores but on their normalised scores. (2016) 2 SCC 495 distinguished. [Paras 28 to 32 & 34
fpfdRlk f'k{kk ços'k fu;e] 2018 ¼e-ç-½ && fu- 14-7 rFkk 4 && uhV LukrdksÙkj ijh{kk && lsokjr vH;FkhZ && ojh;rk lwph rS;kj djuk && ijh{kk e.My }kjk ladFku dh xbZ 'krred ç.kkyh ls vH;FkhZ dh ewy ;ksX;rk ugha] cfYd rqyukRed ;ksX;rk çdV gksrh gS && ;g rdZ ds fcYdqy ijs gS fd vf[ky Hkkjrh; Øe lwph esa ,d vU; vH;FkhZ dh rqyuk esa vf/kd vad çkIr djus okys vH;FkhZ us jkT; lwph esa mlh vH;FkhZ dh rqyuk esa de vad dSls çkIr fd, && vfHkfu/kkZfjr && vadksa dh rqyuk ijh{kk ds laca/k esa gksuk gksrh gS] lwph ds laca/k esa ugha && ;fn vf[ky Hkkjrh; ojh;rk lwph esa Øe lkis{k çn'kZu ij vk/kkfjr gS rks nks vH;fFkZ;ksa dks i`Fkd~ dj jkT; lwph esa j[ks tkus ij mudk lkis{k çn'kZu çfjofrZr ugha gks ldrk && vf[ky Hkkjrh; ifj.kke ij dksbZ vk{ksi ugha && vU;Fkk Hkh] ,slk vk{ksi ugha fd;k tk ldrk D;ksafd ijh{kk ds iwoZ lHkh vH;fFkZ;ksa dks ç.kkyh Li"Vr% vfèklwfpr dh xbZ Fkh && fookn dsoy e/; çns'k jkT; ds fy, jkT; ojh;rk lwph ls lacaf/kr gS && jkT; ojh;rk lwph rS;kj djus ds fy, vaxh—r ç.kkyh dh dksbZ vf/klwpuk ugha nh xbZ Fkh && e/; çns'k jkT; ds fy, uhV&LukrdksÙkj 2024 ijh{kk dh jkT; ojh;rk lwph fLFkj ugha j[kh tk ldrh && rnuqlkj vfHk[kafMr && lsokjr vH;fFkZ;ksa dks muds ;FkkçkIr vadksa ij ughä cfYd muds lkekU;—r vadksa ij çksRlkgu vad nsdj u, fljs ls jkT; ojh;rk lwph rS;kj djus dk ijh{kk e.My dks funs'kA ¼2016½ 2 ,llhlh 495 çHksfnrA ¼iSjk 28 ls 32 ,oa 34
ORDER
Sachdeva, J. --1. Petitioners, who are all in-service candidates and had appeared in the NEET – Post Graduate 2024 (‘NEET-PG’ for short) examination, seek a direction to the Respondents to redraw the State Merit list for the in-service candidates.
2. The dispute pertains to the State Merit List for the State of Madhya Pradesh. As per the Petitioners who are in-service candidates of the State of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as ‘in-service candidates’), their merit in the All India List is higher than some of the other in-service candidates but in the State List they have been shown lower in the Merit.
3. NEET-PG examination was initially scheduled to be held on 23.6.2024 in a single shift, however the same was postponed by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on 22.6.2024. To ensure additional measures of security and to maintain sanctity of the examination, it was decided to conduct the examination at limited test centres. Accordingly, it was notified on 5.7.2024 that the NEET-PG examination would be held on 11.8.2024 in two shifts.
4. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS for short) which conducted the test, in its Reply has contended that the qualifying criteria for NEET-PG as prescribed in the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations notified by the National Medical Commission is based on percentile. For General/EWS the eligibility criteria is 50th percentile; for UR PwD, it is 45th percentile and for SC/ST/OBC (including PwD of SC/ST/OBC) it is 40th percentile.
5. In view of the above eligibility criteria, NBEMS notified on 9.8.2024 that the percentile based normalisation process, which was being used by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi for its various examinations conducted in more than one shift, would be adopted.
6. As per the NBEMS, to eliminate bias in distribution of candidates, equal numbers of candidates were randomly allotted different groups (shifts). Further, with a large population of examinees spread over the entire country, possibility of bias becomes remote. The overall merit/ranking is based on the percentile score of the ‘Raw score’ obtained by the candidates in their respective shift and tie-breaking criteria as per the Information Bulletin for NEET-PG – 2024. Percentiles upto 7 decimal places for the raw score are calculated and the percentile score for the raw scores for both the shifts are merged and arranged so as to derive an overall merit list/ranking. The percentile score is the relative performance of all those who have appeared for the examination.
7. As per the reply filed by NBEMS, All India NEET – PG 2024 rank was based on percentile obtained as per the notified normalisation process. It is contended that several States/Union Territories in India have a provision to award additional incentivised marks in NEET – PG to their in-service candidates who have served in rural/hard posting. The incentivised marks in percentage of the raw scores obtained differ from State to State ranging from 0.263% to 35%.
8. In the State of Madhya Pradesh, in-service candidates who have served in rural/hard posting are entitled to 10%, 20% and 30% incentivised marks in percentage of their raw scores based on the period of completed service in rural/hard area. Candidates who have completed one year are entitled to 10%, and those who have completed two years, 20% and those more than three years, 30% incentivised marks of their raw scores.
9. Both, Dr. Subodh Kumar, Executive Director NBEMS and Dr. N.I. Iboyaima Mangang, Additional Director (Medical) NBEMS explained the methodology adopted for preparation of the All India ranking and the State ranking. They also submitted a State list and a note of their submissions. As per them, both the list and the note of submissions contain certain data which is confidential and not in public domain. Consequently, we are not mentioning the names of candidates or their raw scores in the order. The State List and note
The court upheld the normalization process for merit lists and clarified that bonus marks should be awarded based on raw scores, not percentiles.
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
Reservation in Appointment – Candidates belonging to any of vertical reservation categories would be entitled to be selected in ‘open category’ and if such candidates belonging to reservation categor....
Point of law : appellants/petitioners cannot take advantage of the defective drafting of the Rule, as the position in the year 2016, is not the same as existing now. The earlier procedure followed by....
Eligibility for AIQ seats is dictated by state regulations, overriding national guidelines for OBCs who are not granted percentile relaxation based on domicile.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.