SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 51

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Krishna Gold – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shantanu Sharma for petitioner; Raghav Shrivastava, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:-

“In the facts and circumstances of the case the Petitioner humbly prays as under :

A) That the Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order in the nature Mandamus or other appropriate Writ quashing the impugned action of the Respondents and restore the current account being no 42710200002016 of the Petitioner with the Bank Of Baroda Respondent No3.

B) Cost of this Petition.

C) Such other relief/ reliefs this Hon’ble Court deems fit.”

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a proprietary firm, engaged in gold trading, and its account at Bank of Baroda has been freezed at the instance of respondent No.2, the Senior Police Inspector, Cybercrime Police, Solapur, Maharashtra, as has been informed to the petitioner by the Bank. The account of the petitioner has been freeezed can also be demonstrated by the cheque, which was deposited by the petitioner, on which the Bank authorities have endorsed that the account has been freezed.

3. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that according to the information re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top