Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
PRANAY VERMA
Two Brothers Coffee Solutions Through Its Proprietors Siddharth Panchal – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief against account freeze under article 226. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents justify account freeze based on police directives. (Para 4) |
ORDER :
PRANAY VERMA, J.
1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:
"7.1 Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of Certiorari, thereby calling for the entire records pertaining to the freezing of the Petitioner’s bank account from the office of the - Respondent, for the purpose of judicial scrutiny;
7.2 Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, thereby directing respondent to forthwith lift the hold/freeze imposed on the Petitioner’s bank account and restore the said account to regular operational status;
7.3 Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, directing the Respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation/objection in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner an effective opportunity of hearing;
7.4 To allow this petition with costs;
7.5 To pass any such other order(s) as th
The court emphasized responsible banking practices in freezing accounts based on police requests and reinforced judicial oversight in such matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
