SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 176

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Rakesh Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Praveen Dubey for petitioner; Girish Kekre, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Since pleadings are complete and learned counsel for the parties are ready to argue the matter finally, therefore, on their joint request, it is finally heard.

2. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the assail is made to an order dated 4.4.2025 (Annexure-P/11) passed by respondent No.2, whereby the petitioner has been placed under suspension.

3. As per facts of the case, the petitioner being an in-charge Principal was performing his duties at Government Shaheed Bhagat Singh P.G. College, Pipariya. However, during the course of evaluation of answersheets, certain irregularities were noticed and made viral on social media and thereafter, an enquiry was conducted wherein statements of various persons were recorded and then, the Enquiry Committee submitted its report vide letter dated 3.4.2025 disclosing the fact that the answer-sheets, which were to be evaluated by one Ms. Khusbhu Pagare, Guest Faculty, got evaluted by one Pannalal Pathariya, Lab Technician Class-IV employee. The enquiry report further revealed the fact that Ms. Khusbhu Pagare, in her statement, had admitted the fact that for evaluating the answer-sheets on her behalf, she had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top