SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(MP) 57

JAI KUMAR PILLAI
Anusuiya Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
L.C. Patne for petitioners; Anirudh Malpani, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. These writ petitions arising out of various impugned orders passed by the respondent Authorities cancelling the candidatureship of the petitioners in different selection processes for appointment to the post of Uchha Madhyamik Shikshak (different streams).

2. Since common questions of facts and law are involved, all the petitions have been heard analogously and are being decided by this common order.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are residing within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. Prior to marriage, the concerned petitioners were residing in another State and belongs to a reserved class community, for which a valid Other Backward Class (OBC) certificate / SC / ST Caste certificate was issued by the Competent Authority of that State.

4. It is further the case of the petitioners that upon marriage with a permanent resident of the State of Madhya Pradesh, the petitioners shifted her residence and was issued a domicile certificate of the State in accordance with the prevailing Government policy and circulars. After acquiring domicile status, the petitioners claim entitlement to all statutory and constitutional benefits available to members of the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top