SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 886

ARUN MISHRA, SUSHMA SHRIVASTAVA
Manzoor Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
J aggi Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P. Sharma for petitioner; Pushpraj Agrawal for respondents.

ORDER

Arun Mishra, J. -- 1. Writ petition has been filed as against order dated 25.3.2009 passed by the trial Court rejecting an application filed by the defendants under Order 7, Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code to reject the plaint on the ground that trial Court was not having pecuniary jurisdiction as well as adequate court fees was not paid.

2. The plaintiff/respondent has filed the suit for declaration of title and confirmation of possession. Prayer has also been made to declare the sale deed dated 20th September, 2007 as null and void. Prayer for permanent prohibitory injunction has also been made.

3. Plaintiff has averrd that plaintiff is the Bhumiswami of the land in question. Her ago is 100 years, she is disabled also. Plaintiff No.2 is residing with her and looking after agricultural operation. Plaintiff wanted to obtain the loan under the Kisan Credit Scheme for improving fertility of the land. She was assured by the defendant that performing formalities, she would have to sign certain documents. Under the guise of processing the papers of ~san Credit Scheme, a sale deed was got executed which she has never executed. She has lodged objection on coming to know of the execu










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top