Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Sanjeev S.Kalgaonkar
Sheru Alias Lulla – Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details of sheru alias lulla (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments raised regarding the conviction (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. evidence and reliability in conviction (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. prosecution's burden regarding firearm recovery (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 22) |
| 5. conclusion on sentencing and judgment adherence (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjeev S. Kalgaonkar, J.
This criminal appeal u/S 415 of Bhartiya Nagarik Surkasha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS,2023’, hereinafter) is filed assailing the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.11.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jawra, Distt. Ratlam in S.T. No. 07/2023 whereby the appellant – Sheru alias Lulla was convicted for the offence punishable u/S 324 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 06 months and fine of Rs. 500/- with default stipulation for rigorous imprisonment of 01 month on non-payment of fine. Sheru was also convicted for offence punishable u/S 25(1-B)(a) of the ARMS ACT ,1959 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 03 Years with fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipulation for rigorous imprisonment of 06 months. Sheru was further convicted for
The court reduced the appellant's sentence for illegal possession of a firearm due to its harshness while affirming the conviction for assault under IPC, emphasizing the need for correct punitive mea....
The prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt; failure to adhere to legal standards and evidentiary requirements can result in acquittal.
The failure to properly seal and document seized items raises reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
The court emphasized the necessity of credible witness identification and the examination of all relevant evidence in criminal proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for independent witnesses and corroborating evidence in cases involving the recovery of weapons and confessional statements made in....
The prosecution's failure to prove seizure of arms and lack of valid sanction for prosecution under the Arms Act results in acquittal due to reasonable doubt.
Manufacture, sale of prohibited arms and ammunition - Conviction confirmed - As per Section 3(1) no person shall acquire, have in his possession, or carry any firearm or ammunition unless he holds a ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
