Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK JAIN
Gendalal Sen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
By way of present petition, the petitioner has sought following relief(s) :-
"(i) To allow the instant petition by issuing writ of ‘mandamus’ directing the respondents to regularize/abs orption the services of the petitioner from the date of regularization of services of the junior employee/similarly situated employees with all consequential benefits.
(ii) To call the entire record in respect of the petitioner proper adjudication of the case.
(iii) Any other relief or writ or direction or order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper looking the facts and circumstances of the case be awarded to the petitioners including the cost of the litigation."
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is working in the respondent Organization since the year 1986 and in the intervening period, his services were retrenched and he had approached the Labour Court. The Labour Court passed award dated 10.07.2001 and it has been categor
Long-term service in irregular employment merits regularization despite procedural non-compliance, reaffirming equal treatment rights under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Long-term employees cannot be denied regularization solely due to the absence of formal appointment documents; equitable treatment under Article 14 mandates similar consideration for all similarly si....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article