State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Aditya Tiwari

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(MP) 37

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK RUSIA, PRADEEP MITTAL
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Aditya Tiwari – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Smt. Janhavi Pandit Additional Advocate General
For the Respondent:Shri Abhay Tiwari, Advocate, Shri Pravesh Naveriya, Advocate

ORDER :

Pradeep Mittal, J.

The present writ appeals arise out of the order dated 03.07.2013 passed by the learned writ court in W.P. No. 610 of 2012, whereby the writ petition filed by writ petitioner Aditya Tiwari (respondent No. 1 herein) was allowed and direction was issued to appoint Aditya Tiwari against the post of ex- serviceman general category stating that against the general quota, no reserve quota candidate can be adjusted and appointment of Anurag Jahariya was cancelled stating that he was wrongly adjusted from reserve quota to general quota of ex-servicemen. Since both these writ appeals involve a common issue, they are heard and decided together by this common order. References to the annexures and documents are taken from W.A. No. 1156 of 2013 for the sake of convenience.

2. The facts leading to the filing of the present cases are that the examination for post of Sub Inspector was conducted by respondent no 1 in the writ petition. There were 30 posts reserved for filling up all the post of Sub Inspector (Radio) in which as per the reservation provided 20% for Scheduled Tribes, 16% for Scheduled Caste and 14% for O.B.C. Out of total 30 posts 15 belong to the unreserved

Click Here to Read the rest of this document