ARINDAM LODH
Satyendra Bhattacharya – Appellant
Versus
Tripura Gramin Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARINDAM LODH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner by way of challenging the order of penalty of dismissal imposed by the disciplinary authority, affirmed by the appellate authority and for a direction upon the respondents for reinstating him in service with all consequential service benefits.
2. Brief facts are as under:
Anil Kumar vs. Presiding Officer and Others
Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A.K. Chopra
Bharat Iron Works vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel and Others
B.C. Chaturvedi vs. Union of India
Central Bank of India vs. Prakash Chand Jain
Corporation of City of Nagpur vs. Ramachandra
Chairman Managing Director Union Bank vs. K.C. Kakkar
Disciplinary Authority-cum-Regional Manager v. Nikunja Bihari Patnaik (1996) 9 SCC 69
Government of Tamil Nadu vs. A. Rajay Pandian
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Another vs. Asok Kumar Arora
Joginath D. Badge vs. State of Maharashtra
Kashinath Dikshita vs. Union of India
Kuldeep Singh vs. The Commissioner of Police and Others
Maya devi (dead) through LRs. v. Raj Kumar Batra (dead) through LRs. (2010) 9 SCC 486
Narinder Mohan Arya vs. United Insurance Co. Ltd. (2006) 4 SCC 713
Nand Kishore vs. State of Bihar
Nelson Motis vs. Union of India
Principal Secretary, Government of A.P. vs. M. Adinarayana
Rajinder Kumar Kindra vs. Delhi Administration
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Chitra Venkata Rao
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Sree Rama Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.