IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
Akil Kureshi, S G Chattopadhyay, JJ.
Tripura Electricals – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tripura, represented by Secretary, Department of Finance and ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.1745 of 2017
Decided On : 19-04-2021
CST Act - Sections 6, Sub-section (1) of Section 6, 7, Sub-section (1) of 8 - T-VAT Act - Section 19 and 19(5)- Registered dealer - Testamentary succession - Granted permissions - Petitioner proprietary concern was engaged in buying and selling goods within State of Tripura and for it was registered as a dealer under Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 - legal heirs of the deceased, he had left behind a will executed - Proprietary business by way of testamentary succession to his elder daughter - wife of the deceased is still alive - Elder daughter of the deceased - Business and entered into detailed correspondence and has been granted permissions by department in name of the proprietary concern.
Finding of the Court : Succession of business upon death of sole proprietor, let petitioner even now apply for amendment of registration certificate - If such applications are filed within a period of two weeks from today with supporting documents - Application as expeditiously as possible - If he does accept the application, same would have effect from of death of the sole proprietor - If such amendment in registration is granted it would be open for petitioner to re-activate request for grant of C-Form on inter-State transactions which shall be decided on merits.
Result : Petition is disposed of
JUDGMENT :
Akil Kureshi, J.
Petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents for issuing C-Forms as required under Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (“CST Act” for short) in favour of the petitioner firm.
2. Brief facts are as under :
3. On 27th April 2016, on behalf of the proprietary concern an application was made to the State Value Added Tax authorities for issuance of C-Forms for the years 2015-16 in connection with the inter-State purchases made by the petitioner firm. This would invite tax at reduced rates. However, the respondents have not issued such C-Forms presumably on the ground that the petitioner firm is not a registered concern.
4. Appearing for the petitioner learned Advocate Mr. Rajib Saha submitted that the respondent authorities were well aware about the death of the original proprietor of the concern and that his wife and daughter had inherited the business. It was on this basis that necessary permits for inter-State purchase of goods were granted and assessments made which were also challenged before appellate authorities and appeals were entertained. It would, therefore, be too late in the day for the authorities now to contend that since the registration of the firm was not amended after the death of the proprietor, C-Forms cannot be issued.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel Mr. A Nandi appeared for the respondents as a special counsel and opposed the petition. Referring to an affidavit-in-reply dated 29th September 2018 filed by the respondents, he submitted that it was the duty of the petitioner to have the registration of the firm duly amended upon the sole proprietor dyeing. The petitioner failed to do so. Merely because at one stage certain C-Forms may have been issued would not give a vested right to the petitioner to claim such certificates for subsequent transactions. Even an unregistered dealer is liable to pay taxes.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused documents on record, we notice that Section 6 of the CST Act creates a liability on every dealer to pay tax as per the prescribed rates. Sub-section (1) of Section 6 provides that subject to the other provisions of the Act, every dealer shall, with effect from such date as the Central Government may notify, be liable to pay tax under the Act on all sales of goods other than electrical energy effected by him in course of inter-State trade or commerce. Section 7 of the Act pertains to registration of dealers. Under sub-section (1) of Section 7, every dealer liable to pay tax under the Act has to get himself registered within such time, as may be prescribed, by making an application for such purpose. Sub-section (1) of Section 8 of the Act provides that every dealer who in course of inter-State trade or commerce, sells to a registered dealer goods of the description referred to in sub-section (3), shall be liable to pay tax which shall be three per cent of his turnover or at the rate applicable under laws o
Point of Law : Succession of business - valid registration is necessary for a dealer to claim concessional rate of tax on inter-Sate sale of goods- demand of the petitioner, therefore, for the author....
The cancellation of a tax declaration form does not retroactively affect previously valid inter-state sales, and tax demand notices cannot be deemed enforceable without prior assessment.
C-Forms cannot be cancelled retrospectively, and the benefit of the C-Forms in question cannot be denied to the petitioner.
Point of law: Goods other than the goods mentioned in section 2(d) of the CST Act as amended by section 13 of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2017 are not covered by the GST Act, the CST Act has b....
Entitlement to statutory form cannot be denied due to administrative technicalities when all conditions are met.
The court emphasized the importance of allowing the petitioner to link the GSTIN of the transferor with the transferee to facilitate the clearance of tax liability and avoid anomalies, despite techni....
Statutory requirements under sales tax legislation must be strictly adhered to for tax benefits; delays in compliance cannot be condoned by tribunals.
Selling dealer's entitlement to rely on C Forms submitted by the purchasing dealer for claiming exemption of concessional rate of tax, and the inability to deny the benefit of the C Forms if the purc....
The court ruled that non-furnishing of 'C' Forms by a purchaser due to financial distress does not absolve entitlement to tax exemptions under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
The court established that the ultimate burden of tax determines the entitlement to refunds under the CST Act, regardless of the dealer's registration status.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.