SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 172

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Arindam Lodh, J.
Nitai Deb - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 151 of 2020
Decided On : 23-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate, Mr. K. Nath, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. G.A, Mr. N. Majumder, Advocate, for the Respondent

Regularization of Part Time Workers to Daily Rated Workers is based on existing governmental schemes, and no legal basis exists to backdate regularization before such schemes were introduced.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Regularization of service - Government memorandum dated 07.11.2012 - The petitioner was engaged as Part Time Worker since 23.12.1997 and sought regularization after 10 years; absorption as Daily Rated Worker effective from 01.12.2012 upheld by the court. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Writ jurisdiction - Court confirms that the absence of a prior scheme for upgradation means petitioner's claim to backdate regularization to 1997 is unfounded. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner engaged as a Part Time Worker filed for regularization after a decade, following a committee report that governed others like him. The government issued an order following its established scheme for DRWs effective 01.12.2012.

Findings of Court:
The court supported the respondents' decision regarding the effective date of service absorption as lawful, adhering to the existing government policy.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner was entitled to earlier regularization prior to the implementation of the government scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the regularization policy implemented clearly established the effective date of absorption, and the petitioner's claim for an earlier date lacked legal support due to absence of prior scheme provisions.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. regularization of part time workers after 10 years (Para 2)
2. official engagement as drw effective from specified date (Para 3)
3. absorption scheme validity for part time workers (Para 4)
4. legality of absorption based on existing scheme (Para 5)
5. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. M. Debbarma, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the State-respondent and Mr. N. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for respondents- Tripura State Electricity Corporation Limited.

2. The simple case of the petitioner is that he was initially engaged as Part Time Worker w.e.f. 23.12.1997. The petitioner has prayed for regularization of his service on completion of 10 years of service in the post of Group-D. It is pertinent to mention herein that, the petitioner along with other Part Time Workers had filed writ petitions before the Hon’ble High Court. While disposing of those writ petitions, this Court had directed the respondents to constitute a committee to consider the cases of the petitioners for their regularization or absorption as DRWs or in the post of Group-D according to their entitlement. The committee was accordingly constituted. The petitioner along with others submitted representations. The official records relating to each of the petitioners including the present petitioner were examined by the constituted committee. The committee on such examination and verification of the records submitted its report to the concerned Departments.

3. In pursuance of the report of the committee, the respondents No.2, 3 & 4 had issued an office order dated 20.07.2019 (Annexure-11 to the writ petition) engaging/absorbing the petitioner as DRW (Group-D) categorically w.e.f. 01.12.2012 as per memorandum dated F.10.12-FIN(G)2007(Part-I) of 07.11.2012 of the Finance Department, Government of Tripura and financial effect was given prospectively. The petitioner has sought for his absorption as DRW w.e.f the date he completed 10 years of service as Part Time Worker.

4. This Court is constrained to observe that, at the relevant point of time, there was scheme for such upgradation from Part Time Worker to Daily Rated Worker. The Government of Tripura had come up with a scheme for absorption of all Part Time Workers who had completed 10 years of service vide memorandum dated 07.11.2012 as stated above. According to the said memorandum dated 07.11.2012, the Part Time Workers who had completed 10 years for service, their services would be regularized w.e.f. 01.12.2012.

5. In view of such scheme introduced by the Government vide memorandum dated 07.11.2012, in my opinion, the absorption of the petitioner as DRW w.e.f. 01.12.2012 does not suffer from any illegalities. The petitioner has sought for regularization of his service w.e.f. the date of joining as Part Time Worker i.e. from the year 1997 and completed his 10 years of service in the year 2007, when there was no scheme at all for such upgradation from Part Time Worker to Daily Rated Worker. As such, I find no illegality in issuing the Office Order dated 20.07.2019, absorbing the petitioner as Daily Rated Worker w.e.f 01.12.2012.

6. Having viewed thus, the instant writ petition stands dismissed being devoid of merit.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top