SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 39

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Biswajit Das – Appellant
Versus
Gita Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.R. Barman, Advocate, for the Appellant; H.K. Bhowmik, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an appeal filed under Section 28 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 against the Judgment and Decree dated 10.12.2018 and 20.12.2018 respectively passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. T.S. (Divorce)83 of 2012, whereby, the divorce petition filed by the appellant herein was dismissed.

2. The facts of the case in brief, which may be relevant for the present purpose and manifest on the record are that the marriage between the appellant here, Sri. Biswajit Das, and the respondent-Wife, Smt. Gita Das was solemnized at the parental house of the respondent at Narshingarh, Agartala on 30.01.2009 as per Hindu rites and customs and after observing all necessary formalities of Hindu Marriage. After marriage, the respondent-wife herein, Smt. Gita Das went to her in-laws' house in Beltai Road No. 12 and started to live along with her husband peacefully for a few days. But, after 15 days of their marriage, the respondent went to her parent's house at Narshingarh without the consent of the appellant-husband and after 3 to 4 days, she returned back to her in-laws' house. Thereafter, on several occasions, she used to visit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top