A. Kapani vs State of Manipur - 2021 Supreme(Manipur) 70

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Manipur) 70

AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
A. Kapani – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. N. Ibotombi, Sr. Advocate & Mr. D. Julius Riamei, Advocate, for the Petitioners; Mr. N. Kumarjit, AG, Manipur, Mr. L. Shashibhushan, Advocate & Mr. HS Paonam, Sr. Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior advocate and Mr. D. Julius Riamei, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners and Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned AG appearing for the State respondents, Mr. L. Shashibhushan, learned advocate appearing for the ADC, Senapati and Mr. HS Paonam, learned senior advocate appearing for the private respondents No. 4-17.

[2] In the present writ petitions, the petitioners are assailing the requisition letter dated 10.07.2020 submitted by the 14 members of the Autonomous District Council (ADC), Senapati and meeting notice dated 23.07.2020 issued by the Deputy Commissioner (DC), Senapati for removal of the Chairman and Vice-chairman of the ADC, Senapati as well as for declaring the proceedings of the meeting of the members of the Autonomous District Council, Senapati held on 07.08.2020 for removal of the Chairman and Vice-chairman of the Autonomous District Council, Senapati as null and void and to quash the same.

As the issues raised in the present 3 writ petitions are common and interrelated, the said 3 writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

[3] The relevant facts of the present cases in a nutshell are that all the wr