G.ROHINI, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Zubair Ul Abidin – Appellant
Versus
Sameena Abidin @ Sameena Khan – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.—This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 17th July, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction in CS(OS) No.918/2012 filed by the respondent/plaintiff, of dismissal of the application filed by the appellants/defendants under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908. Notice of the appeal was issued. We have heard the counsel for the parties.
2. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit from which this appeal arises for the reliefs of (i) declaration that the Talaqnama dated 15th February, 2012 is null and void and non-est in the eyes of law; (ii) permanent injunction restraining the appellants/defendants from selling, alienating and/or creating third party rights in the matrimonial house i.e. Flat No.705, 7th Floor, Saba Apartment D-3, Sector 44, Noida, U.P. and from dispossessing the respondent/plaintiff therefrom; (iii) permanent injunction restraining the appellants/defendants from misusing the writings, photographs and videos of the respondent/plaintiff in their possession; and, (iv) for damages/compensation for ruining the life of the respondent/plaintiff.
3. The appellan
Roop Lal Sathi Vs. Nachhattar Singh
Shah Babulal Khimji Vs. Jayaben D. Kania
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. Vs. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express
Vigneswara Coop. Housing Society Ltd. Vs. K. Balachandramouli
Chief Inspector of Stamps Vs. Indu Prabha Vachaspati
ITC Limited Vs. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
T. Arivandandam Vs. T.V. Satyapal
P.P.A. Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mangal Sain Mittal
Abdul Gafur Vs. State of Uttarakhand
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable Vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner
M/s. Commercial Aviation and Travel Company Vs. Mrs. Vimla Pannalal
Smt. Tara Devi Vs. Sri Thakur Radha Krishna Maharaj
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. Vs. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.