M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Bhimavarapu Laxma Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Pallothu Aswini Kumar – Respondent
M. Seetharama Murti, J.—This second appeal by the unsuccessful plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code, for short) is directed against the decree and judgment dated 18.1.2010 of the learned VII Additional District Judge (Judge, Fast Track Court), Vijayawada passed in AS.No.112 of 2008 whereby the learned Additional District Judge while dismissing the said first appeal had confirmed the decree and judgment dated 2.6.2008 of the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Vijayawada passed in OS.No.2962 of 2004 filed for a declaration that the plaintiff is in exclusive possession of the suit schedule property prior to 1992 and that the said possession was confirmed by the possessory sale agreement dated 28.5.1992 and perfected title by adverse possession and for consequential perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, followers, servants etcetera from ever interfering with the plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment over Ac.4.00 cents of agricultural land out of total extent of Ac.8.97 cents in R.S.No.322-1 of Pathapadu village of Vijayawada Rural Mandal more fully described in the schedule annexed to the plaint.
Sunil Kumar Jain v. Kishan and others
Rambaran Prosad v. Ram Mohit Hazra and others
K. Mallikharjuna Vara Prasad v. K. Poornachander Rao (died) and others
Chatti Konati Rao v. Palle Venkata Subba Rao
Mohan Lal (deceased through his LRs) v. Mirza Abdul Gaffar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.