SANJAY KAROL, DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY
Roshan Lal (deceased) through his – Appellant
Versus
Pritam Singh – Respondent
Sanjay Karol, A.C.J.—The difference of opinion between two learned Judges of this Court, sitting singly in separate proceedings, led the matter to be placed before us for answering the following question:
“Whether the provisions of Hindu Succession Act apply to agricultural lands?”
2. In Baldev Parkash & others v. Dhian Singh & others, Latest HLJ 2008 (HP) 599, the view taken is that the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Succession Act’), are not applicable to agricultural land, whereas, vide judgment dated 14th October, 2015, rendered in this very case (RSA No. 258 of 2012), by relying upon the decision of the apex Court in Vaijanath & others v. Guramma & another, (1999) 1 SCC 292, a contrary view stands taken.
3. The question at best can be answered by examining the Constitutional provisions qua competence of the Central Government to enact the laws, pertaining to “succession” of agricultural land. In fact, legislative competence of the Central Government is the sole question, which arises for consideration in the present
Accountant and Secretarial Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Bai Vajia v. Thakorbhai Chelabhai
Deepak Yadav v. Government of NCT of Delhi, W.P.(C) No. 8967 of 2014, AIR 2000 SC 434
Hoechst Pharmaceuticals v. State
Jagannathan Pillai v. Kunnjithapadam Pillai
Madhu Kishwar v. State of Bihar
Nirmala v. Government of NCT of Delhi
Smt. Gulwant Kaur v. Mohinder Singh
Union of India v. H. S. Dhillon
Union of India v. Harbhajan Singh Dhillon
Vaddeboyina Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddi
Velamuri Venkata Sivaprasad (dead) by LRs v. Kothuri Venkateshwarlu (dead) by LRs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.