SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MANISH PITALE
Subhash Mukundrao Deshmukh – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Mukundrao Deshmukh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Akshaya Sudame, Advocate
For the Respondent:Rohit Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manish Pitale, J.—By this revision application, the applicant, who is the original defendant No. 2, has approached this Court challenging order dated 24.09.2021, passed by the Court of XIth Joint Civil Senior Division, Amravati, whereby an application filed by the applicant for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was rejected.

2. The case of the applicant before the Court below was that the suit filed by respondent No. 1 seeking declaration, injunction, partition and separate possession did not deserve consideration by the Court below, for the reason that an earlier suit for identical relief filed by the very same party was unconditionally withdrawn and disposed of as such. It was submitted that only one property was subject matter of the earlier suit, but in the subsequent suit other properties were also included. It was submitted that once the respondent No. 1 unconditionally withdrew the earlier suit and abandoned his claim, he could not be permitted to pursue the subsequent suit. This contention was obviously raised on the basis of Order 23 Rule 1(4) of the CPC.

3. The respondent no. 1 opposed the said application. The C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top