SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Pidugu Padmavathi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Challa Adilakshmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Nimmagadda Revathi, Advocate
For the Respondents:G.V.S. Mehar Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT (COMMON)

Parties to S.A.No.433 of 2018 and S.A.No.472 of 2018 are same. The dispute that arises between them in both the second appeals are same. Therefore, both the appeals are to be considered together and they are to be disposed of by a common judgment.

2. O.S.No.9 of 2002 was a suit filed before learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet and O.S.No.63 of 2002 also was a suit before the same Court. Plaintiffs in the second suit are defendants in the first suit. Both the suits were tried together and common evidence was recorded for both the parties in both the suits and by a common judgment dated 11.10.2011, the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet dismissed O.S.No.9 of 2002 and decreed O.S.No.63 of 2002. That led the loosing parties to prefer two appeals. Plaintiffs in O.S.No.9 of 2002 who lost their suit, filed A.S.No.96 of 2011 and the same parties who are defendants in O.S.No.63 of 2002 filed A.S.No.97 of 2011 before the learned XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet. Learned first Appellate Court heard both appeals together and by a judgment dated 17.11.2017, he dismissed both the appeals and thereby confirmed the judgments and decrees pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top